All, thank you for sharing your thoughts and thank you for posting @.B. JD ASAP as it sounds that we are in a similar situation (work FT, familiar with LSAT).
I also started studying (again) in late February 2019, after taking a few months off after studying with BP last year from 03/2018 to 10/2018. I am barely on negation in the Some/Most Relationships section of the curriculum and second guess myself about going too slow as well. I'm having to relearn or retrain myself as this curriculum is much more thorough, which I definitely need to have a concrete understanding.
Has anyone had issues with one section of an exam glitching to where the answers appear to be moving from left to right? I experienced this during a PT on Sunday, the first RC section was fine but when I moved on to the second section of LR the first three questions were glitching. Unfortunately I couldn't continue to take the practice exam like that. Was using safari on MacBook. PT #62.
@ Apple podcasts the specific episode referenced above is titled "#2 - AMA 7 Sager Accounts Playable 150s to 174 LSAT" #ripnip
@ thank you for the recommendations. I created e-flashcards on Quizlet but I think linking the argument form to real questions will be very helpful, to learn and reinforce.
thanks for the tip!
Does anyone have recommendations for supplemental materials in reviewing valid and invalid argument forms?
I started the sufficient lesson today however I realized I need to go back and review the prior lessons. I did not locate a 7sage webinar on validity, any suggestions in addition to reviewing the valid and invalid lessons?
Count me in please message me.
I would check out the webinar on this topic (and STR) super helpful breakdown!
This is so dope! Thanks for setting us up for the real deal!
I love the blind review option however, anyone else notice that the answer you selected during the set is darker than the other four bubbles? Not helpful for BR. @
This was a question that I skipped during PT and gained in BR. Reviewing it now this question is challenging and a bit confusing because we are choosing a flaw to strengthen the sociologist's argument because the whole to part or composition flaw highlights why the romantic's argument is not right, thus supporting the the sociologist. I also thought this was a strengthen question, not a sufficient assumption question. Will star this to review further.