Hey y'all - I am having so much trouble with this question if anybody can help.

AC E:

OK, sure - if one candidate spends $1 mill, then all the other candidates can also spend $1mill. But why doesn't it go the other way? If one candidate can only afford to spend $500, wouldn't everybody else be restricted to that $500? Wouldn't the allowance be on the lowest limit which then ensures equity?

AC B:

What if the upper limit is $10mill? Then one candidate would be able to spend $10 mill, while another candidate may only be able to spend a tenth of that. So how does that upper limit help?

#help (Added by Admin)

For Q17, is it just common sense or does it state somewhere in the passage that V. cholerae must be "awake" in order to cause cholera in humans? I picked E but changed my answer during BR because I didn't find evidence that V. cholerae was incapable of causing cholera when dormant. #help

Anyone else not pick C due to very specific wording?

The answer choice stated "the end of the artist's lifetime," which I interpreted to mean towards the end of his life - aka while he was still alive. But the passage tells us that the copy was made after his death, which seemed to contradict the answer choice and hence why I went with E...

#help (Added by Admin)

Same here! :)