Hey all. I'm writing to ask for some advice about the upcoming August test for which I'm registered. I've been studying for about 9 months and for most of that time, I saw a significant increase in my score. I was testing consistently twice per week with PT60s and PT70s and getting a few points above my target score. Now that I'm testing in the 80s, I'm scoring well below where I was in the PT70s. Logic Games have stayed consistent (-3/-4) but my LR and RC went from around (-3/-4) each to (-9/-10). How is that even possible?
I've read lots of posts about how the tests don't change much and they're scaled accordingly, but I am honestly convinced that the PT80s LR and RC sections are significantly harder than the PT60s and PT70s. The questions are more challenging, and the wrong answers seem way more tempting and way more difficult to parse out. Is anyone else finding this to be the case?
I'm seriously considering cancelling my registration, because if I'm testing this poorly 2.5 weeks out, I know it'll only be worse come actual test day. sigh
I had difficulty with this question. I'm all on board with the "international measures" part of AC A, however, the part that seems problematic is "should not adversely affect countries that are not part of the problem." Clearly Zimbabwe thinks the ban would adversely impact the country, which is why they oppose the total ban. However, I don't think it's at all clear that Zimbabwe isn't part of the problem. They've eliminated poaching (i.e. illegal killing of elephants), but they still perform controlled culling, and quite possibly they're using the ivory from those elephants to participate in the ivory trade. This all seems plausible under the circumstances outlined. Zimbabwe bans poaching - illegal killing of animals for ivory, etc.- but they openly permit and engage in legalized culling. So, who says that Zimbabwe isn't part of the problem?
From my reading, eliminating poaching is distinctly different from not participating in the ivory trade.