same mistake here. My takeaway is to always be bringing in / taking into account the premises whenever you want to do something with the support, which is what we do on LSAT. :)

that's because u assumed people in different regions don't want their house kept at a relatively universal temperature, as we nevertheless usually do.

not sure if we can keep AC A from Q 10. Better than any expert? is that what Authot A would agree? I feel that he only says marking is an amazing predictor. Not that it matters a lot in terms of the right AC but I do wonder.

#help

this is subtle but because the stimulus says the rebate would save a significant amount of money should the player choose to purchase it after rental(s), it's a reasonable inference that those that have rented the game would most likely to purchase it in order to finish the game.

well overlooked the dinstinction already made by Simon.. my bad. emphasize again how important careful reading is

I thought legal fees and settlement are kind of same thing? (not a native speaker)

#help

i thought E was extremely attractive but never noticed the there's any problem with "intention" there.

takeaway: skip it lol

I don't get why E is the correct AC for Q6. Perhaps I didn't understand what "private" means in the last paragraph; so doesn't a message being considered "private" means you are actually having privacy rights over this message, versus when you don't have a "reasonable expectation" of privacy, your company can read what's on there without being legally punished?

#help

for those who might wonder why D doesn't work (if implicitly meaning 37% of the time it helps avoid collision thereby making it life-saver): having precise information for a statement already stated in the stimulus - phantom airplanes - doesn't help.

I feel that C is more of giving evidence to support the claim in the premise....

#help

I believe this is an issue of English mastery rather than logical difficulty.

If so, just remember that in English, "a few" is a positive word, suggesting that there are actually some; in contrast, "few" means there's little to none, carrying with it an implicit sense of negativity. (not as in bad, but in terms of actually having something vs. almost not)

Speaking as someone who's not a native speaker so can def feel your confusion

The argument does show that laissez-faire capitalism deserves to be rejected, because the author argues it is not a social philosophy that promotes peace and order, given that any social philosophy that does not promote peace and order deserves no attention. (it is a logically complete argument already, so AC B is wrong)

But wait, the problem is, though, why is laissez-faire capitalism isn't a social philosophy that promotes peace and order, in the first place? (this part I think you get already, given your comment)

Hope it helps

absolutely on point regarding your last sentence... 😂

How do you know if you rly have ADHD? I have been suspecting growing up that I have difficulty focusing on doing things but, fortunately, exams are never too difficult for me to fail at them or whatever... until LSAT. so I have been thinking about getting diagnosed to see if I could have some reasonable accomodations but seeing other comments esp. regarding how sometimes prolonging the test might actually make it worse coz you are so damn tired having sit there for hours when you are in the last section or two.....

Any thought on this?

#help

this passage is really really difficult

Exactly the explaination I need Ty

For me I think the most important thing for me to choose AC C is that the author fails to address the meaning/definition of hapiness, while he or she has already addressed the second part of the philosopher's argument, which is difficulty of achieving hapiness.

hi i am interested. taking April and June as well