Deleted
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Nice. Learned a new thing about global warming / climate change.
Just want to post to say thank you for posting this, especially in this brutal cycle.
I got my first rejection this morning. Although somewhat expected, it did hurt.
But I really believe what doesn't kill you can make you stronger (if you let it).
You don't have to listen to me but Spivey seems to agree with that: "I have never seen an aspiring law student fail to get to where they want if they simply worked hard and stayed positive."
I found his blog post below incredibly helpful for someone on the same boat :smile:
https://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/if-you-didnt-get-the-lsat-school-you-dreamed-of/
Do you guys have any comments on this boy?
The 180Watch - LSAT Prep Watch https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JML2IHQ/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_GfhOzbYJ0YRXJ
I have the same question as well! Hope someone can give their two cents.
Following this as well. Will they also make you remove the second monitor (even if off)?
P: Geo power plants produce heat by heat from underground. In areas where drilling to such underground sources is possible, geo power plants are more economical than conventional plants.
C: However, advocates contend that the economical power from geo power plants will be available in most areas.
Correct AC D: Advance drilling tech is being developed that will soon make it both feasible and economical to drill deeper many times compared to currently.
This is correct because it is directly about geo power plants, which are mentioned explicitly in the conclusion. Also, pay attention to the strength here - it uses WILL, which corresponds with the WILL assessment in the conclusion.
Wrong tricky AC E: Recent research has lead to discovery that could lower production costs for nearly all types of power plant.
This seems like it's stronger because it covers all power plants but it's actually weaker because it uses only COULD. Furthermore, this is not as directly about geo power plant as the correct AC.
#help - Does this mean that "as" is a sufficient condition indicator?
The second premise and conclusion on JY's diagram appear to have just slash rather than conditional logic arrows. I understand that the explanation treat these slashes as normal conditional logic arrows, which would suggest that "as" introduces a sufficient condition. I'd appreciate it if someone can confirm that this is the case.
Interested! DM'ed you!
People, stop eating carbs when you try to lose weight.