- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Go over some last minute things but more importantly, GET SOME SLEEP. Sleep is highly underrated but is a MUST before taking a test.
At this point, there isn't must you can improve but as long as you go in there well rested and with a good attitude, you should be able to perform to the best of your capacity.
Can't you also make assumptions with the last sentence "while many people criticize etiquette because they believe that it has no beneficial effects for society, these same people think that kindness and social harmony is good?"
There seem to be some parallels within this sentence where the author implies that etiquette at least vaguely fits in the same/similar categories as social harmony and kindness. It seems to be implied that social harmony and kindness are beneficial, just like etiquette. It also implies that etiquette is in the same category of "good" like kindness and social harmony.
This line of thinking helped me pick C so I hope it's not completely wrong lol.
If I was you, I would not be retaking the lsat LOL. But I would use your time to write a kick ass personal statment. Congrats!
"B sounds like a good answer if you don't know what is going on" CLOCKED
This question isn't even hard. The wording just threw me off
Yes. It means you were not 100% sure of the correct answer. When BR I look at the ones I missed both times and the ones I initially got right but changed the answer.
I used the old syllabus for the June test but I love this new formatting with the questions forcing you to try before the video! Nice job 7sage! <3
Sure!? But I also feel like reading and dissecting philosophy as well as articles can also be helpful if increasing your English level is your only goal. But you are free to come suffer with us lol
You can't assume that heart disease and heart attacks are the same, especially on a test like the lsat where they are very particular on their wording.
Based on the last sentence, we know that f/s/a causes high triglycerides and is a factor in heart disease. From this we can link up triglycerides --> heart disease --> heart attacks.
With D we are questioning the author's assumption that t --> heart disease when it could be true that heart disease --> t, which would best weaken the author's argument out of all of the options.
The argument becomes very confusion if you assume that heart disease = heart attacks.