- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Aside from the 1-star difficulty that this passage is ascribed, did anyone else find this passage to be hard? I went -1 with a miss on Q5 (same issue as other posters have described, basically) but this passage ate up so much of my time.
Can vouch for this service - I've been working with Henry and it's money well spent. Great for identifying weaknesses, and streamlining your studying to be most effective. Good stuff 7Sage!
My lack-of-attention-to-detail brain read societies as 'species' and used that to choose B. Thought it was the weirdest argument in the entire world and that a conclusion couldn't be made for, say, lizards, based on university students' dating success. Ok bruh
I attended a webinar tonight on diagnosing issues with the 7Sage analytics tool / score report. In the session's Q&A piece, there was a note made on blind review by a moderator - and specifically, blind reviewing with a timing component (an example was made for when you are blind reviewing RC - not taking as much time as you want reading the passage, looking up words, and so on, as that doesn't help you perform better once you're back into another PT with the clock ticking).
This got me to thinking about how I should be blind reviewing. Should my goal of blind review to not do a complete deep dive into passage/question intricacies, by factoring in some sort of a time component? Should I simply blind review less in order to see more cumulative LSAT material that I otherwise wouldn't?
It may sound excessive (I am not sure if it is), but fully reviewing a PT can take me in excess of 7-9 hours... Wonder if I should be allocating that time to new material instead.
Or, more generally, can anyone point me to some effective blind review habits that I can factor into my studies?
Thanks very much!
How was your exam Mr. Sus? Are you one step closer to finding your LSAT honey and moving on with your life or are you still in the trenches with me??
Foolproofing really is the gold standard. Your intuition of when/how to split games, or move forward without splitting, needs time to develop, and the only way to get there is just doing as many games as you can. It's just straight hard work and exposure to multiple games. Best of luck to you.
Couldn't even focus on the answer choices here, post-stimulus read, bruh. So, got it wrong. My heart strings were being tugged. Who could withhold treats from a good pupper?
Question 5 - isn't "emphatic" a little strong? Thoughts?#help
Tricked me too. Exact same reasoning. I erroneously assumed that the increase in demand was split among LargeCo and competitors.
#help I understand why (E) is correct - but, for (A), are we not able to classify the (planimetric = mastery) view of to the proponent as objectionable? Can't this be called an "other objectionable view"?
I couldn't immediately dismiss A for this reason.
There's a similar approach mentioned by BurtReynolds on the recent 7Sage podcast (I listen to these on SoundCloud): Preview games 1 and 2, size them up and take on the easier one first to build confidence, and then do the same for games 3 and 4 - usually doing 3 first as there's a higher likelihood of game 4 having some quirks. Seems as though the confidence you can get by hitting the easier games first outweighs any loss of time from having to flip through a bit.
Check it out, and good luck in your studies!
@dustinbodnar12278 said:
@kwangleestuff519 paper plates fam, that's the secret. Easier to take the trash out than washing platos
u deserve the world
heheheh. i still be psychoanalyzing my mom telling me 2 do the dishes
Anyone else have no idea what franchise meant when reading the passage? I think my misunderstanding actually helped in the questions when I was reading answer choices about elections and just being like... ok?
#help for question 10, where is the support specifically that these works of Shakespeare etc. have been traditionally seen as representing the high culture of Renaissance England? I understand that Binns asserts that this is not the case, but is it just then implied that this is how they have been traditionally characterized?
4-5 PTs in a week is quite a lot.
While your mileage may vary (getting acquainted to the test with that method could help you), blind review/reviewing the results of your exam should take at least a day or two in my opinion.
If you aren't spending enough time in review, you're 1. burning through fresh testing material that you could find yourself needing down the road, and 2. not diving deep enough into review - which is where I'd argue most of your progress is made.
Good luck with your studies!