I feel like this question's answer is cart before the horse. The contrapositive does not exist the way A implies. You have A (IMP) will lead to B (AGS) will lead to C (SLA) will lead to D (UMR) per the answer given. But really its A + C leads to B and C leads to D

The stim indicates two criteria are necessary for AGS: IMP and SLA

If you have AGS, you will have both of those, but no SLA does not mean IMP isn't there, it just means there is no AGS. The stim gives two parameters for AGS. IMP and SLA. The explanation falls apart at that point. This question doesn't have a right answer.

Using the Star Wars reference used in the video:

You need to use the force (A) to be a Jedi (B), if you don't have a light saber (C) you will not be a Jedi (B), lightsabers (C) are elegant negotiation tools Jedi use (D).

Does this mean if there is no lightsabers there is no force? C has no bearing on A. You can have all the inspired musical performances you want. There just won't be a good show without a sophisticated listener. Thats not what Answer A is saying. Answer A is saying without (C) there is no (A). No, without (C) there is is no (B)

I feel like I need this re-explained so I don't make this mistake again, but I simply don't see my broken logic.

What it should say is "But without a good show, there will be no sophisticated listeners in the audience." That fixes answer (A) right?

3 3/5 on hard in a row. each time, I hit the trap answer with my mistakes.

Going to try this one more time before moving on.

A little lost but I will figure it out.

B made sense to me because the idea that US teeth are rotting, and not only do they put fluoride in the water, the dentists also use it. Clearly fluoride isn't working, which is what I felt like the point of the argument was.

I felt like E was too vague to strengthen.

PSA questions are hard.