Is there a strategy to make reading negations and translating them into lawgic less uncomfortable? For example for question 4, when I see the lawgic statement, I understand it as "do not not know their income", but this ends up confusing me more than it helps.
Sorry, I've been skipping around the lectures as last-minute prep before the LSAT. Is there a video/lecture that goes over all of the lawgic rules like negate sufficient?
PrepTest February 1997 - Section 3 - Question 13
Can someone explain why the answer for this question is not D? I can see why the answer is B but I wasn't able to eliminate D from the answer choices.
Admin Note: Edited title. For LR questions, please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
overthought in blind review but not enough to apply the most rule :(
2 made me give up... coming back to this tmrw