I am in the same boat. I am working full time and taking lsat in Feb. I've been studying for about 5 weeks and i've taken 2 full PT's. My first diagnostic was a 148 and after that I started 7sage. Got mostly through the core and took another timed PT and scored a 151 (pretty discouraging). The median score for the school I want is a 155. I'm thinking if I can get a high 150's, low 160's, then I should be (hopefully) in a safe spot.

My LG section is -11, RC is -12, and LR is -8.

Since it sounds like the LG is the most improvable I am changing my studying to drilling 2 LG sections a day + BR + explanation vids . and 1 LR or RC section a day + BR (then analytics of the concepts I'm missing).

I think if I improve my LG section to a -3 or -4 and improve my RC and LR by 1-3 questions correctly then I should be able to score 158-161.

Extremely interesting how our lived experiences influence our assumptions! As a working mom of a 3 year old, I had to experience the constant sickness (hence exposure to germs) of my daughter once I put her in daycare. It was crazy! So because of my experience and ability to make the assumption, I knew E was correct.. but I can totally understand your line of thinking!!

Pat's dad owns VideoKing

Thats the answer choice I was hunting for!

I personally found this skill builder to be easier if I just first thought about "what conclusion can i draw intuitively?" instead of trying to first translate everything into Lawgic then draw a conclusion. #feedback

Thanks for giving an LSAT example of why this is so important!