I'm almost done with the Foundations section of the curriculum, and really enjoyed it up until the Lawgic section. I'm really struggling to see the utility of it, personally, since we won't have time to 'translate' all the questions on the LSAT itself. There also haven't been any examples shown of Lawgic being used on an actual LSAT question either, so I just don't get how it directly applies to the test or what the ultimate learning goal is. I'd rather be able to intuitively understand questions, than waste time memorizing formulas and drawing diagrams for every question - it just doesn't seem efficient.
What do others think? Am I missing something? I just feel really frustrated and lost after this unit.
I understand how to 'convert/translate' these sentences and am getting them correct, but I feel like I'm not really understanding the purpose or deeper learning objectives behind all this. How will this help us on the test, in such a time-limited setting? What is the actual goal here? It'd be helpful if lessons told us explicitly how/when to use this on questions in the LSAT, how it's directly applicable, and maybe incorporated more relevant practice.