why in the frick wasn't this the first lesson in the module

if you were my greatest enemy, i would screenshot these invalid arguments and send them to you and tell you that they're valid

i've finally figured out the difference between negating an "all statement" and a conditional statement because they seemed the same to me.

every "all statements" is a conditional, but not every conditional is an "all statement".

the negation of an "all statement "can be one of these 2: X <-- s --> /y or x and /y

the negation of a conditional can ONLY be: x and /y

i hope this is right and helps someone

is there a typo on the last notable assumption in the summary? should it say, "if it's impossible to tell whether someone's action is moral, then you should evaluate the action based on consequences instead of morality"?