you have to pay the LSAC lawhub advantage for using 7sage. I think its bc 7sage is cheaper than most other lsat prep programs LSAC makes you pay the lawhub advantage. if you don't pay it, I think they can stop letting you use 7sage.

started in june, taking it in sept

Can you guys write the lawgic in terms of the the actually question and not just use A and B?

is the conditional statement /bravery -> /Gryffindor

and the contrapositive gryffindor -> bravery??

I'm very confused here, does anyone know of of videos online that can explain this to me?? #feedback

no, sometimes a conditional claim that has a sufficient and necessary statement doesn't have conditional indicators or qualifiers, thats why you can't only base it off the conditional indicators or the qualifiers.

For #10, why is it "valid" wouldn't it make more sense for it to be judgement -> consequences. I know that makes the domain "valid moral" and "about a particular action" but it seems more confusing to have it valid -> consequences??