I agree! Was very disappointed to see that a drill I took used a question from the 70s...now I feel like that entire prep test is ruined.

I originally chose E, but after reading, one thing that should rule E out immediately is the fact that the AC is reffering to the "way a child learns best" whereas Dana's argument only mentions "a child's accustomed style of learning". Aside from the other reasons that E is incorrect, it should be noted that Dana does not explicitly agree with E. Perhaps she thinks that her proposed method should be used despite the way that the child learns. Who knows.

I got hella caught up on this one because I differentiated people with "income low enough to qualify" from people who are unemployed. This is why I picked C. It makes sense to me that if people from another town who lost their jobs moved to Baysburg in search of work (indicating to me that they are still unemployed) they do not have incomes to qualify them for assistance. HOWEVER, because they DO NOT have an income they then qualify for assistance, it is not the low income that qualifies them, but the lack of income at all. This would then explain the increase of people in town who received food assistance while also explaining the unchanged number of people in Baysburg who qualified based on low income because the increase includes people with low income AND with no income. I am honestly not entirely convinced that C must be incorrect. #help

This question also appears in the curriculum as a causation question-- so anyone who has gone through all of the videos will have already come across it. Thank you!