I believe that may or may not be wrong, we just don't know given the closed universe of these arguments. SC must receive EP, as that is a categorical thing. EPA is an action as I see it, and you do not need to be a SC to have EPANALYSIS performed. The question would be if the SC gets EP, not equal protection analysis? I may be wrong as well, but this is how I saw the problem.

Must be true questions, like the Disney example, are typically the strongest. The premises are locked in place, not suggesting an answer, but giving the framework to derive an answer. If not this, than that. The weakest on the other hand, being the Trash bin, is merely suggestive of an answer. We get the conclusion by piecing together the information that would do have. There is no equation to solve as in a MTB question.

The coffee can holding the coffee I would drink is now all gone. My brother, sitting on the couch, is bouncing up and down with a mug sitting next to him. Therefore, my brother must have been the one to have used the coffee.