Same here, getting error 404.

I also got the same message.

I got this answer wrong because the last sentence confused me. So Essentially after having a full blow conversation with chatgpt trying to figure out the logic behind this, I think we came to an agreement lol. This is what I got:

The last sentence states that people without insomnia were studied and in many of those studies ONLY A FEW were significantly affected by melatonin. PEOPLE WITHOUT INSOMNIA, ONLY A FEW WERE AFFECTED. Cool.

Answer choice C is the best answer because it directly strengthens the passage by stating that now that subjects WITH INSOMNIA were studied only the subjects without insomnia were significantly affected by the doses of melatonin. This does two things, it confirms the claim that melatonin does not treat insomnia and the second thing is it reaffirms that melatonin may work only for those without insomnia but barely works for those without it (if you also consider the last sentence).

I asked chatgpt to give me a simplified version of this explanation so here is that:

Answer (C) is correct because it directly supports the argument that melatonin doesn’t help treat insomnia.

The last sentence says that only a few people without insomnia were affected by melatonin. (C) adds that when insomniacs were included in studies, only the non-insomniacs were significantly affected.

This does two things:

1. Confirms that melatonin doesn’t work for people with insomnia.

2. Reaffirms that melatonin has limited effectiveness, even for people without insomnia.

I hope this helps someone, I'm going to be honest the logic here is still hard for me to wrap my head around but this is what I'm getting.

I'm interested!

I got it right by using the process of elimination, all the others seemed more irrelevant. However, going through the comments and looking back at the question I figured out I did not fully understand the stimulus. The stimulus states, that they would like to question each codefendant on their own with their legal council but without the legal council of the other codefendants. Therefore, if two share the same legal council then one would have to go in without legal representation. Then the judge states that they will not make anyone look for a different legal counsel. So, the judge makes the decision to deny the request on the basis of (the most strongly supported answer choice B) which is each person has the right to legal counsel being present when being questioned.

I hope this helps someone!

I'm interested!