I think both but unsure.

I was going to do the same thing for the same reason (take at home because I've been studying there), but ended up taking it in-person. I chose to because of the paranoia I had regarding the horror stories of the strict proctors that always assume any irregularity is impropriety. Whether or not those fears were based in reality, what I can tell you is the in-person test went quite well. They provide you with noise-cancelling headphones and you never really know anybody is there. Also, to prepare for taking the test in an unfamiliar location, I took my final prep test at my office instead of my room at home, and I got one of my best scores. I'd vote to take it at the testing center so long as you have one close (mine was about 40 minutes away). Best of luck.

@HenryLehmann Yeah that's what it said in the video the LSAC sent about the testing center. I like it too.

I do believe you get noise cancelling headphones if you take it in person though. Right?

I have been in a similar boat, actually. Been scoring mid-160's and then out of nowhere I'm back in high 150's. Luckily, I took a test the other day and got back in the mid-160's and have my confidence back. What I did to get myself out of it was work on full sections (RC and LC) and critically evaluate every question (especially the wrong ones). Doing this got me more comfortable focusing for a longer period of time (I had been mostly working on shorter drills rather than full sections and I was able to complete those without paying much mind to them) which will prepare you more for a full-length test, and it is much more representative of your true ability than those drills where you do 5 or 10 questions. As for what else I credit for returning to the mid-160's: I had coffee much closer to the start of the test than usual, and I made an effort to really go hard and not let me back hit the back of my chair. Over the course of a long 2.5-hour test, there might be times where you want to take it a little easier, and I am guilty of that more than anyone. Last test, however, I didn't allow myself to do that. I treated every question like it was the most important question of my life. Maybe I'm overstating it, but hey, I got back to where I wanted to be. Just a suggestion. Good luck in February.

I had always heard that too many LSAT's is a worse look to admissions than too few. That being said, the too many is probably like 4+. What law schools care about regarding the LSAT above anything else is your score. So if you hit a school's median on your 4th LSAT, you're in a better spot than if you send in 1 LSAT that is below the median. Of course, sending in 4+ LSATs where you don't get that median is a worse look than sending in 1 LSAT below the median. At the end of the day, a good score will overshadow any concerns among admissions regarding the number of LSAT attempts you take. But if you're worried about sending in 2 or 3 scores, I'd advise not worrying.