Subscription pricing
PT Questions
frozenpea
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
frozenpea
Saturday, May 03
Realizing that the content of the dubious claim doesn't actually matter. We don't need to know what the author thinks is dubious, we just need to understand the fact that the author is rejecting Arnot's conclusion because of a purported weakening of a premise. If we ignore the content of the "dubious" claim (the government can be trusted to act in the public's interest) then it becomes more clear that the form of weakening another person's argument (by showing weakness in one of their points/premises) does not mean we cannot nonetheless accept their conclusion.
I appreciate the curve and the % likelihood of certain scorers selecting the correct answer, it helps me view myself in the context of other LSAT takers. This is a data question of sorts, but would it be possible for the software to keep track of our answers and provide an aggregate estimate of a potential score? To illustrate, what if there was a "my stats" tab that said something like, "you've answered X amount of questions identified as difficulty 4/5 and on average select the same answer that a person with a 1XX score is likely to have." There could be an option to change the time frame too, "in the last month you have...", "in the last week...". This may be too complicated and unnecessary, but it's food for thought. This would definitely help boost my confidence as I am learning more and becoming more comfortable with RC and LR. Could be a neat feature!