whoever wrote the summary / written explanation for this question is goated

you can press the grey circle to the right of each answer, which eliminates them (i.e., greys them out). and if / when you go back to those questions, the answers that you initially got rid of will still be eliminated.

? he's trying to emulate a realistic mental process while reading a passage. and trying to figure out how to properly pronounce a name with time constraints would have no effect on one's score, thus it would be a waste of time. in fact, even for unfamiliar words that, unlike names, could affect the material/message of the passage, Kevin has skipped these words and explained numerous times that it is a waste of time to try and pronounce/figure out what a word means. thus, skipping over an unfamiliar name is entirely consistent with the rest of the curriculum's approach lol.

this is not true lol. In "The Social Responsibility Of Business Is To Increase Its Profits," for example, Friedman, like the author in paragraph 2, first explained the idea of a corporation having a social responsibility. unlike this author, however, Friedman proceeded by arguing against that notion.

@Marperch how would they ever not be staged? should JY / Kevin start camping outside test centers on Test Day?

thanks Brady, i just put my net worth into FTX token

i agree with this for some other lessons.

this explanation/lesson, though, is probably one of, if not the most useful and information dense throughout the cc so far. he explains like four logical fallacies that are extensively covered in philosophy courses lol.

but i also have no idea why these important concepts are dropped in the middle of nowhere instead of having distinct & labelled lessons for each fallacy.