Hi everyone, I just found out that LSAC has plans to gradually remove the logic games section from the LSAT supposedly through 2023. Was just wondering if anyone knows whether this next testing cycle is going to contain the logic games section...
just out of curiosity is this GPA from your LSAC academic summary report?
Right. So there are 3 scored sections (LR,LG,RC) but not necessarily in that order. the fourth section is experimental (a random pick of the three sections) and is not scored.
not sure if we can necessarily call JY's boards the standard but ive definitely found myself drawing different boards from him. nothing wrong with it so long as you are finishing the games accurately in a reasonable amount of time
so the issue here is that by choosing B, I probably assumed that the 'mammals that survived' were also the same 'large North American mammals', when they weren't. Is that what JY is referring to? If so, I understand what I did wrong now.
#help
im pretty sure that the issue here is that i completely missed the point of the argument. the editor is arguing that by giving their regular advertisers favorable mentions, they are going to be working against their (the advertisers) interests being that the advertisers would like for the editorial to continue being an effective vehicle for them. I got tripped up and made a bad connection in that I missed the referential phrasing and made assumptions without thinking about it.
#help
I have reviewed this question over a few times now and I am still not sure if I am supposed to completely ignore the fact that the apples are greasy. Is this a detail that test writers added just to throw me off?
did you apply as URM? sorry if this is personal! just a little curious.
#help
The reason that I thought that answer B could be correct was because when we reject a belief, are we not invariably replacing that belief with a new one?
suppose my old belief was that: "all chickens are tasty"but then after eating one rancid chicken nugget i reject that belief and now think "not all chickens are tasty".
can someone explain why this is wrong?
But also I should be more wary of seeing the word "probably" in the stimulus. This particular answer choice type has caught me off guard a few times now.
the reason why i thought A was the correct answer was because of the response that Arjun had to Yolanda's argument. Yolanda was arguing that one event was potentially (more) dangerous than another.
In response to this, Arjun stated that another, completely different event was also dangerous. I thought that Arjun was failing to make a distinction between something being dangerous and something else being more dangerous.
could someone follow up one this?
#help (Added by Admin)
I suppose that I should also keep in mind that i am supposed to focus on the reasoning in the argument as opposed to how the reply is structured.
I agree. The biggest issue that I had with answer choice E was that it stated that the product would sell "better" when nothing in our stimulus gives us any insight on how a product would sell "better" than a previous version.