The only reason I got this question right was because I wrote out the premises' conditionals and the conclusion's conditional like you taught us. Doing that made me notice the giant hole in the major premise's support for the conclusion. It would've never clicked for me otherwise.
Major Premise: Love-Feeling -> /PromiseSense
Conclusion: /Love-Feeling
Only way to get to conclusion (i.e., which sufficient condition leads to this conclusion)? Contrapositive of Major Premise: PromiseSense -> /Love-Feeling
Oh, that's D!
Insane Question.
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
The only reason I got this question right was because I wrote out the premises' conditionals and the conclusion's conditional like you taught us. Doing that made me notice the giant hole in the major premise's support for the conclusion. It would've never clicked for me otherwise.
Major Premise: Love-Feeling -> /PromiseSense
Conclusion: /Love-Feeling
Only way to get to conclusion (i.e., which sufficient condition leads to this conclusion)? Contrapositive of Major Premise: PromiseSense -> /Love-Feeling
Oh, that's D!
Insane Question.