- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Soo, I just requested a test date change to June becasue I'm registered for April (and April probably won't happen) but I want to restore my prev cancelled score, I'm worried that my request will take me off the list to restore.
Do you guys think this is the case or am I just overthinking?
Been studying since Fall 2018 for earliest entry 2021. I know that standardized tests are not my strong suit and I'm not stopping until I'm consistently getting all those 4 & 5 dot questions correct.
My Reasoning for A
One sample of a class of things (Ancient Cities that were supported by special farms)...keeping in the back of mind that special farm -> big city surrounding
stim goes, oh big-city type area was found with no surrounding farm, therefore this couldn't have been a city. Flawed reasoning because the stim says nothing about big cities only that when special farms there has to be big city
so big city is suff for special farm but a big city doesn't necessitate a special farm
however, the stim concludes that if ancient city therefore must be surrounded by farm
idk it seemed to fit but i can see how the whole "class" language is ambiguous and B is a nice suff-necess flaw answer
How does "express wishes" not restrict the allocation of funds by the directors....
Okay so I wrote last July, not prepared enough, enticed by the freebie, got a 152 and cancelled, target score is a 163-164. So that means I have the free retake in April but I am only 35% through CC and will also still be taking a full course load, thus I wouldn't as prepared as I could be. It's for these reasons that I want to take in August but I also don't want to wait the April opportunity.
My question to you guys is, Would a hypothetical LSAT score history of a cancelled score, a 155-158 (if I took in April) and then a score of around 164 (goal score for August) look bad to schools?
so the correct answer is saying diatoms, the things that is argued to have created low levels of CO2 have not changed since the time of the ice-age weakening thereby as, if there is still the same amount of diatoms now yet there is an increase in CO2, diatoms could not have been the cause of the low CO2 levels during the ice age?
#help
- Depends, requires, relies = necessary
- “If assumed”, “if true”= sufficient
Okay panicked on this one and just tried to match structure. I'm going to break down the stimulus.
- General Premises
Since not all tenured faculty are full professors
=some tenured faculty are adjunct
- Specific Argument
Since every faculty member in the linguistics department is tenured
/=/ some must be adjunct
- The flaw is that while there could be some adjunct, with the rules given, there is nothing to suggest this is a definite conclusion. Could they all be full-time, yes. Could they be adjunct and full-time, yes. So this is flawed.
now for D
- General Premises
Some buildings designed by famous architects are not well proportioned
=not all buildings designed by famous architects are not well proportioned
- Specific Argument
All the government buildings are designs by famous architects
/=/ some must be not well proportioned
- The flaw is that while there could be some buildings that are not well proportioned, there is nothing to suggest this is a definite conclusion. Could they all be not well proportioned, yes. Could none of them be well proportioned, yes. This is the parallel flaw to the stimulus.
UofT is like perfect for "Canadian" Big Law. What are your career aspirations?
I'm going to go from a 3.67 to a 3.56, I'm on a 4.0 scale as well.
@zacharytsmith26826 said:
I wonder what they will replace logic games with
Maybe it'll be along the same lines as LG, in the sense that it will still be aimed at tasking test takers to spot patterns and other analytically based things, I can see it being similar to the ACT science section where you're giving a bunch of scientific data to parse through correctly.
I'm aiming for a 160 as well, I've had the best results in LR by going immediately to #11, and spending most of the time up front on the harder questions, getting to he end with around ~18 mins remaining, while starring tough questions and skipping any PR/PF questions before going back to #1 and do 1-10, then hit those starred questions and then finally the PR/PF questions before reviewing.
For RC, I have less of a strategy, but will still star lots of tricky questions to come back to, my thing with RC is to really just visualize an the author and get into the material and tone. I have a hard time assess during the section which passages are the hardest vs easiest so I tend to just go first to last.
Edit: Oh yeah, and good luck, we got this.