I approached B by thinking about the relativity of a premise to its conclusion. It seemed to me that B almost entirely invalidated one of the strongest premises by showing that it was inapplicable, and knowing that most of the time its only one answer choice that will do that, I chose it. Truly, I don't think its the best way, but it worked for me.
Do you guys feel like you'll have enough time to think and use lawgic on the exam? I can't imagine it.
5
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I approached B by thinking about the relativity of a premise to its conclusion. It seemed to me that B almost entirely invalidated one of the strongest premises by showing that it was inapplicable, and knowing that most of the time its only one answer choice that will do that, I chose it. Truly, I don't think its the best way, but it worked for me.