Hi! Is it wise to go through all of the drills or problem sets in a class while you're studying the set? Or is it better to learn the material/watch the question run-throughs and then spread out the drills throughout the week? An example would be the MSS Question Class set in the LR section. I feel if I do all 12 of the MSS problem sets spread out (maybe 2-3 a day), it'll help refresh my memory more often instead of doing it all at once and then not touching it until I take a PT.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
This question was my proof that one, I didn't understand the question stem and two, I didn't grasp the role of "even though."
JY's explanation for why B was wrong was different than my justification for choosing it. I immediately went straight to the "step length being shorter on a hard surface" bit of the stimulus and figured that they weren't accounting for tall people having longer legs and therefore, wider steps.
This one cost me that perfect 5/5 :')
Keeping the scope of the argument was hard for this one which was why I thought D was the wrong answer. In my mind, consent was given by the parents but that's just an assumption I made based on our world instead of the LSAT world.
Besides the word "stretch" in Answer C (which can also indicate some kind of change in the T-shirt like shrinking), why wouldn't C be correct? The first line of the stimulus states that "Clothes made from natural fibers such as cotton, unlike clothes made from artificial fibers such as polyester, often shrink when washed at high temperatures." This looks like a paradox with the concluding sentence about all fabric fibers being reverted back to their original states. Can't we assume that artificial fiber clothes don't change form based on the first sentence? #help
Could someone explain why C isn't correct? If it's right in the middle of 40-60% and it's sufficiently decomposed, wouldn't it be considered a good inference? #help
hey there!! i’d love to join
I swear the scientific questions will be the death of me. The jargon is just so draining to understand...