#help I need a better explanation for why D is wrong. It's the only AC where it specifically mentions policy whereas C seems more broad in my opinion. Also, I interpreted Sarah saying there's "no way this policy can succeed by itself" and Paul directly combating that by sayin "Such cases... volunteering" to be disagreeing about the possibility of policies fostering these habits which is AC D.
I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it doesn't show that megatelescope research is worhty for comparison.... matter? I feel like this is one of the AC that JY will commonly ask "who cares/so what?"...
#help I still don't understand how AC C resolves the discrepancy...
Repost from @outdoor26 "I eliminated the correct AC too quickly; when I initially read ‘ babies of mothers who DID NOT eat nutritious diets’ I immediately thought ‘that has nothing to do with the argument whose conclusion and premises are about babies of mothers who DID eat nutritious meals’. It seemed that my training from previous lessons (to hone in on AC choices which specifically deal with the conclusion/premises instead of those which make assumptions) seemed to have kicked in. Suggestions on how to avoid this in the future (is it simply because we are not making valid arguments so there is more room for assumptions in the ACs?)" #help
#help seems like assumptions were made here. for example, AC D assumes that people are not visiting at night.
I need tips on how to identify the main conclusion quicker. I tend to overlook main conclusions when they are the first sentence in the passage. I chose E initially, but chose A during the blind review because I had plenty of time to make the right decision #help
#help I need another explanation for why B is wrong.. I don't understand JY's..
#help do you find it more helpful to take these problem tests on the computer vs printing them out?
#help where is this covered in the cc? I don't recall and couldn't even identify the question stem...how did we get from PM reasoning to this?
#help why is the answer not E?? We can also add the assumption that it is indivisible so why are we ignoring it? I got P --> /DP --> /MB
I let the #s freak me out.. thought this was the LSAT NOT GRE lol
Did you take the lessons in order like the way JY recorded it? i.e. from LR -->LG -->RC? Is it helpful to start with LG? Based on my diagnostic, this was my lowest section/area I can improve the most.
#help I'm not very good at misleading use questions... how can I get more practice with this in particular?