I graduated college in 2014 but I've owned my business since 2012 and have various business partners, consultants, and attorneys who I work very closely with. I was planning on asking them to write letters of recommendation for me but I recently found out the law schools want letters from college professors. My letters of recommendation from my business associates will be a lot stronger because they know me better than many of my college professors knew me. These people are highly successful professionals (CEOs, Lawyers, University President's etc.) whose opinion I think would hold just as much, if not more, weight than college professors who don't have as great of a relationship with me. Do you all think that having these people write my recommendations instead of reaching out to old professors will significantly hurt my application? Should I attach an addendum to the application explaining why I chose business professionals instead of old professors to write my letters? I will likely also be attaching a GPA addendum to my application as well.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I just started doing this on Monday!
Just an update. I've been timing myself up (starting at 0 when beginning the section and ending either when I'm done, or when I reach 34min). I went from BRing at 18-20 questions right to only getting 12 right when timed. Since I began timing myself up and not having to worry about time like I was during my PTs, I've got anywhere from 16 to 20 correct timed! I think this a huge improvement and I'd be extremely happy if I can get 18 right consistently by June 8th.
I'm the exact same boat as @. I BR at 166+ and PT at 149. I've started to time myself up on the logical reasoning sections and went from getting 12 right timed down to getting 16 right timed up. I think this is helping. I'm continuing to time myself up for the rest of the week and see what I can do when I take a proctored and timed PT on Sunday.
This sounds great! Definitely looking forward to joining in come June!
Thank you all so much for sharing your thoughts.
If I were to postpone and take the test in October, what do you all suggest I do as far as a studying schedule? Should I continue doing the sections untimed until I can consistently get 20-25 right per section or should be ok with only getting 18-22 right per section and begin doing every section timed and then going back for BR untimed?
I'm treating LSAT study as my full time job so I have quite literally all day and night to study which I'm happy to do if I can get a reasonable score come October (or June of course).
Since the beginning of this month I've been spending around 5 hours per day studying for the LSAT. Mainly I'm doing LR questions all day everyday. I do these untimed. I've seen a big improvement from when I first started doing them to now. I'm getting between 20 and 22 per section right consistently. However, today I took a practice test (timed and proctored) and only got 12 and 13 respectively right. I don't understand how I can be making so much improvement untimed and when I do this timed I revet back to only getting a 12 answers correct.
Do you think that allowing myself to do this completely untimed is actually hindering my improvement on a timed test? What do you think I should about this? The test is 3 weeks away and I'm consistently scouring well below what I want to be scoring. If it helps, when I take the test untimed I score between 164 and 166 every time. When I take the test timed (I've done this 3 times now) I only get a 149.
If any of you have any ideas I'd love to hear them. I devote my entire day everyday to this and I've gone through 7sage already and completed almost all of the lessons. Given that I can do reasonably well untimed, I think I have the foundation and basics of how to do the questions but for some reason I can't do any of this timed.
I'm going to look at a few schools this week and wanted to know if there are any questions that I should not be asking the admissions committee. I was accepted at a few unranked schools all of which are giving me a significant scholarship. Is it inappropriate to ask the schools why they are unranked/what their opinion of the ranking system is? I also wanted to ask them how to compare to their competitor schools. For example asking New York Law how they compare to Pace or asking New England Law how they compare to Suffolk etc. These questions wouldn't be in anyway adversarial but I'd very much like to know how the schools answer these "harder" questions. What are your opinions?
Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 is weird and I shouldn't be discouraged by lower scores on this test than the others. I'm working on LR and did fairly well on the first LR section of this PT but I did horribly on section 3. What are your experiences with this PT?
Congrats! Thats a great improvement! You should be really happy with how far you've come.