Discussions

henryarodriguez625911

Joined: Apr 2025
Subscription: Free

LSAT · Do you need to do the whole core curriculum up to starting Introduction to Logic Games

henryarodriguez625911

Wednesday, Jan 25 2023

Thanks Preston, very helpful advice. What are your thoughts on the 6-month timeframe-- do you recommend on holding off PTs completely until the CC is done (I know this is roughly the structure in the syllabus). For example, my diagnostic is rather skewed because I was getting only -5 in RC and LR, but got 6/23 in Logic Games, which I think ended up at a 155 score. So I can't really take full practice tests without wasting them because I know nothing about LG, I think. But not sure if on that timeframe I need to be taking earlier PTs anyway.

LSAT

•

Wednesday, Jan 25 2023

henryarodriguez625911

Do you need to do the whole core curriculum up to starting Introduction to Logic Games

LG is by far my worst section and I am looking to test in June. I'm on the "Introduction to Logic" section of the Core Curriculum (pretty early), but is the core curriculum necessary before getting into "Introduction to Logic Games & Sequencing Games"?

Also, I bought the Logic Games Bible. At what point in the study process should I start with that-- is there a section in the CC anyone would recommend getting to first? Thanks.

PrepTests ·

PT107.S3.Q22

henryarodriguez625911

Tuesday, Jan 24 2023

It seemed to me like all answers were wrong so I chose E. When I read "only the reproductive success of a trait influences its frequency in a population," that also read to me like there is no such thing as an evolutionary pressure to increase the number of goats. So therefore D could not be true as the biologist would be saying that "increasing the frequency of a gene" is not a pressure at all, since how can something that doesn't influence frequency in a population be a pressure?

But now I think my mistake was reading "trait" as identical to "evolutionary pressure"...