I got #6 wrong and of course I chose C. Moving forward I will deff make sure that I can prove my AC within the text.

For LR and RC I am always engaging with the reading silently. At least I always try too... For example, with LR I'll be like "wow, okay! Why is that?" Or "Okay but can you prove that to me..." "Or hey dumbass you are forgetting to think about this.." Staying engaged really helps me.

Note to self: Keep it simple, stupid.

Honestly so proud of myself for getting that diagram correct.

It's the little things... crying emoji

I would say that drilling games is your best option, as well as practicing making inferences. Spend majority of your time drilling games and doing each game over and over until you get 100% each time and within the time limit. Filter in LR and RC work here and there to keep your skill set sharp. Review the lessons on LG.

For Question #4 I was so thrown off by answer choice B. I thought woah this is way too strong. The author never mentioned that there is no solution! They just said that injunctions suck.... Totally missed the word 'apparently'.

A few months later but I will give it a shot.

What is D saying?

D is basically saying "Well, normal criminals, who only make the fake money sometimes, are the reason for the largest amount of circulation of fake money."

What is the argument saying?

It's saying that we should adopt the new method (special ink) because it's harder for criminals to successfully copy and reproduce.

But a criminal who gets in to counterfeiting money could still learn the new method in that short period of time. D is trying to get you to assume that ohh because this criminal is not an expert in the counterfeit business he or she will not be successful anyway and therefore switching to the new method is a big fat waste of time.

WRONG.

D does not really do anything to weaken the argument. It could be correct if we added more information to it. But that's not our job. Our job is to take what we're given outright. Cut and dry.

C is correct because it attacks the arguments reasoning. It says that some counterfeiters could do the new technique but not the old. Perhaps there are some criminals out there in the world who have expertise in special ink just waiting for their chance to produce fake money.

hibbeln.courtney@68748.com

Hopefully I am not too late!

Congrats!!

My friend, it is evident that you are just not understanding the concepts. It is time for you to change your studying method. Keep reworking the problems that you have gotten wrong in the past. Do you really know why you got them wrong? Can you explain why you got it wrong? Do you redo games over and over until perfection?

I would postpone. It is very important that you do well on the LSAT. You need more time to study and to let the ideas/core concepts grow in your mind. THERE IS NO RUSH. Law school is not going anywhere!