I'm still confused on ignoring the first part of the conclusion. I understand that it is stating a reasonable assumption, and I identified the same gap in the reasoning. But, I thought that "determined" was too strong a word and so I got rid of A. I didn't ignore the first part of the conclusion so I wrote it out as artistic merit depends on artist and art critics. But A seems to narrow for this. #help
Can most be read as a group 1 indicator, in that whatever idea follows it is the sufficient condition?
#help (Added by Admin)
1
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I'm still confused on ignoring the first part of the conclusion. I understand that it is stating a reasonable assumption, and I identified the same gap in the reasoning. But, I thought that "determined" was too strong a word and so I got rid of A. I didn't ignore the first part of the conclusion so I wrote it out as artistic merit depends on artist and art critics. But A seems to narrow for this. #help