I'm still confused on ignoring the first part of the conclusion. I understand that it is stating a reasonable assumption, and I identified the same gap in the reasoning. But, I thought that "determined" was too strong a word and so I got rid of A. I didn't ignore the first part of the conclusion so I wrote it out as artistic merit depends on artist and art critics. But A seems to narrow for this. #help

Can most be read as a group 1 indicator, in that whatever idea follows it is the sufficient condition?

#help (Added by Admin)