Thanks everyone! I will write up some LOCIs, and hope for the best! I was just worried about my chances since I got waitlisted across the spectrum - which was unexpected given my numbers.

I second all of the wonderful advice in this thread.

One thing that helped me in RC is to remember that the answers will always be supported by the passage, which means that you can easily eliminate everything that goes against it. For those tough questions where you can’t choose between two convincing answers, refer back to the passage for help.

You need to find the patterns in what you get wrong. If you are falling for common mistakes, such as misreading or getting the opposite answers, then you need to make note of that. Go over your last 5 PTs and analyze the mistakes you made. Categorize your mistakes. Be conscious of them when you take your next PT. I am taking a guess here, but I feel like you are making the same mistakes over and over again. I am considering your gap between your BR score and actual score as evidence of this.

@nbanton11495 I am at the same place you are with LR, and while I don't specific question types that get me, I do tend to make the same type of mistakes on harder questions. I think it might be helpful to look at the questions you missed and categorize what kind of mistake you made on them. Did you miss an important detail? Did you get the conditionality wrong? Look at your reasoning for how you got to the wrong answer and compare it to JY's reasoning. Find the difference and record it.

For RC inferences, I think it might be easier to work from wrong to right, if you are not doing that already. If you are doing it, I would suggest categorizing your mistakes again. There's probably a good chance you're making the same kind of mistakes over multiple inference questions. Hope that helps.

@ifty2nd443 Thank you so much! I will be implementing this system.

@gregoryalexanderdevine723 I meant what you do in your second go-around. How do you pick which questions to re-do in your extra time (obviously if you haven't skipped any questions)?

@zachweisenbarger992 I am where you are now. I usually do well until I get to 15-20, where I lose the most time.

I have read MLSAT before. I will go through it again before drilling.

It does. I will look through both. Thanks!

Recently, I've been missing NA and MSS in half my drills. In the other half it seems to be Flaw and RRE.

I will go over the Trainer soon.

@gregoryalexanderdevine723 I've read the Manhattan. I will be more careful while doing my review of explanations.

@gregoryalexanderdevine723 I am missing around -5/-4 per section, and I will only be doing sections I have already taken before. So there is no worry about wasting fresh PTs. I will add this to the main body to avoid confusion.

I am absolutely interested. I am only in high the160's, I hope that's not an issue.

@ifty2nd443 Yes, I am. My mistakes tend to be spread out among question types. There is a significant number of easy questions that I get wrong, along with a significant number of hard questions.

Thank you all for your input! I was just wondering.

@gregoryalexanderdevine723 Thanks, Alex. I will look into it!

@gregoryalexanderdevine723

I should clarify that I meant "HYS" when I wrote "T3." I did not mean "TTT." My mistake. I am sorry.

@tayloremcneeley589 Thank you for your advice!