shouldn't the conclusion say: glass of milk -c→ lower bp

- I'm confused as to why this isn't the case, help!

4/5, got the weakening question wrong which is my worst area in general.

Does anyone have any suggestions on how they attempt weakening questions? I'd really appreciate it!

I chose E because I didn't want to make the assumption in A that less thieves = less thefts. How do we know when we've made the right assumption? I thought we were supposed to be avoiding them.

#feedback

I think that: "Then place each answer on the spectrum based how much support it's deriving from the stimulus."

should be: "Then place each answer on the spectrum based on how much support it's deriving from the stimulus."

#question I find that this is the case for various questions where my translations look a little different from what JY had drawn but I still got the right answer.. is that okay?

for this question i mapped out:

un-edu → econ. weak

/un-edu → commit-pub-edu.

---- ---- --- -- -- -- --- -- - -- - -- ----

commit-pub-ed → /econ. weak

when reading the answers I mapped them out with numbers (because it's quicker). For AC (B) I got:

1 → 2

/1 → 3

--- --- - -- - --- - -- --

3 → /2

#help is it just me or does anyone else feel that this question requires us to make a lot of assumptions?

in my opinion, AC C is worded terribly and should have been worded differently to solve the discrepancy. We have to assume that the imported species recovered, but the stimulus and AC C don't allow us to make this assumption. It just tells us that the imported species died.

Okay? So what?

Also, just because the endangered oyster species hadn't recovered doesn't mean that the imported oyster species did. Even if the imported species live at the expense of the endangered native species, I'm struggling to see how AC C explains this.