#help What would be the significance of differentiating between background knowledge, context, and concession? We know that premise and conclusion have a big difference that's important to understand how to answer questions but what about concession, what is the importance?

#help I'm just wondering how knowing the difference between major and minor premises, will help on the test. I understand how identifying the sub-conclusion is helpful because it helps clear out any confusion between premise and conclusion. I'm still unsure about the significance of major and minor premises when it comes to the test.

I am wondering the same thing

I thought the Trash Bin Argument would be in the middle in terms of strength, because I was looking at solely how long they were in relation to each other. I realized that the trash bin argument isn't as strong because the link between the premise making the conclusion most likely true is weaker than the other 2 arguments which is why it's on the weakest side and not between Disney and Tiger

on main conclusion questions, some answer choices use referential phrasing of the premise in the answer choices. is it true that the ones with the referential phrase of the main premise (instead of the minor premises) is the correct one? #help

I am going to become fluent in lawgic if it's the last thing I do