Can someone please explain how did we get C as correct AC. We don't have to have same totals in order to get same percentages. Why does this question requires us to make this assumption? Thank you!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
#help#help Can someone explain why C is CORRECT, maybe major airlines are not safe, however, that might be safer than most low-fair airlines. That is my reasoning behind AC C and so I crossed it out. Thank you!
Can someone draw out a Lawgic of this argument, so to see a link. (SA) Thank you!
#help#help#help Doesn't "substantial genetic difference" means "genetically indistinguishable" ( which means different)? I think i didn't understand the stimulus.#help#help#help#help Thank you!
#help#help Can someone please explain why B is not CORRECT assuming that common ancestor could produce multiple threat devices including hissing , however he didn't use hissing at that time, using other devices instead, and so he just passed it on. Thank you! #help
#help#help#help How do you diagram "no one should do this"? Thank you!! #help#help#help#help
#help#help Isn't B just attacks our conclusion which is unacceptable for weakening questions? Thank yuo!#help
#help#help#help Can someone explain How can we assume that the author assumes there is only one joker. Maybe there are 2 jokers but it is not Miller still. There are other 2 people with certain handwriting that could be potential jokers? A just didn't bother me since it is completely consistent with there being two jokers and none of them is Miller. Thank you!
#help#help#help#help Can someone explain please once again how banning pesticides in 70s affected deers in 60s? Thank you!!#help#help#help
#help#help Can someone please clarify why E is correct? Could it also be the case when a pattern that historian imposes affected by some past historians presuppositions and not specifically by THIS historian's presuppositions? Could it be the case, where all that THIS historian did is just excluded somebody else's presuppositions and not included anything of his own. Would argument still stand? Thank you!#help#help
#help#help Can someone explain why E is wrong? E seemed plausible since "few" implies "some, BUT most are NOT" so technically C and E are both correct. Thank you! #help#help#help
#help#help Can someone explain why E is correct? what if a dramatic novel can be both great and belong to the genre of science fiction, but just in Wells's case?? Thank you! #help#help
#help#help Can someone explain isn't A and B same thing? If document were opened then they were destroyed. Thank you!
#help#help Can someone please explain why it is not SA?
#help#help How does E doesn't weaken the argument? Stimulus said that mammals are able to detoxify these plants (they use the liver...) So how come they die from "drug overdose" if they are able to eat it safely? "Moreover, mammals..." So the argument did not say"most, some, few" it just said "mammals" so it is warranted to assume that its referring to all mammals since only the previous sentence used"most mammals" Thank you! Any explanation is greatly appreviated.
#help#help Can someone please provide an example of Mistaken Reversal and Mistaken negation? Thank you!
#help#help#help Can someone clarify why is it Strengthen Question rather than MSS. Assuming that is MSS i chose a relatively weaker degree AC which is A which is correct. But i had no idea it was a Strengthening Question Since the question stem resembles the MSS question stem.
Thank yuo!
Can someone help me to identify opponent's argument, since I don't see clearly where is a conclusion and where are premises. All I see is a set of premises with unstated(assumed) conclusion. Thank you!! #help
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
J.Y. Ping said:
(1) All bananas are made of atoms. [B–>A]
(2) All non-bananas are made of atoms. [/B–>A]
(1) and (2) are consistent with each other.
The contradiction (must be false statement) to (1) would be some bananas are not made of atoms. [B some /A]
HERE Where I AM CONFUSED!!!
But contradiction of all (B are A) is (not A not B) , hence (A is not B) is acceptable since we are failing sufficient only, but contrapositive of that is (B is not A) so we can say (B is not A) hence some bananas are not made of atoms. Please help someone.
#help#help Can someone please explain?
I still don't understand how D would weaken? indicate a flaw in the argument. The conclusion says that journalistic writing style "increases" the chance that novel will be popular - aka it doesn't guarantee, it just increases a chance, so it is totally possible that there are some unsuccessful novels with the journalistic writing style.
Can someone explain why D wouldnt weaken an argument, and C would. Thank you!
Hey guys! Is anybody interested studying together? Let me know! Thanks! My phone is 7187908883. Elissa
Can someone explain why answer is A and not E? ####HELPPPP Thank you.
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
Can someone explain what claim does AC E imply? Is "claim stated earlier" is subsidiary conclusion (1st sentence), or "since dog breeders try to maintain.....) Thank you!
Admin note: please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]" for the discussion title
Could someone please explain why the answer is C and not D. Thank you!
Admin note: please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]" for the discussion title
#help#help#help Can someone explain why A is CORRECT? Author is just saying that approach is ill-advised. Is it allowed to assume that he implies "it shouldn't have cut back on book reviews" Is that a warranted assumption? Thank you!
#help#help#help Can someone explain why A is correct? Even if wavelength doesn't cause both melanoma and sunburn, it may cause sunburn first which subsequently causes melanoma so it doesn't happen stimultenously. Thank yuo!
#help#help Can someone clarify what does "compromised by the conditions" mean in this AC. I don't quite understand it. Thank you!!#help#help
Can most +most = some conclusion ???? Some + some = NO CONCLUSION. Most + some = No CONCLUSION. Can Please Someone help me?!
#help#help#help#help
#help#help Can someone explain why A is WRONG?
Premise: storm--> hurricane
Conclusion: NO storm---> NO hurricane (contrapositive: hurricane--> storm) ---> same structure as in stimulus, so why is A WRONG? Thank you! #help#help
So We can Deny ONLY “some” and “all” relationship??
Can’t we also deny Most, None relationship????? Thank you!!! #help#help#help#help#help#help#help
#help#help Can someone explain why the answer is D - isn't still not explaining why there was LARGE increase in a white- deer population? Thank you!
#help#help For D isn't?? participate--> 1+ years INSTEAD of 1+ --> participate, since 1+ years must be a necessary indicator. Thank you!
#help#help
#help#help#help Can someone explain what does E says? And some clarification on this AC and how it is related to the librarian argument. Thank you!#help#help#help
#help#help Can someone please give an example of Mistaken Reversal And Mistaken Negation? Thank you! #help#help
#help#help#help Can't we attack A by claiming that it can make it faster. JUST NOT SIGNIFICANTLY faster? That's why i hesitated to choose A. #help#help#help Thank you.