Am I the only one who crossed out D because I read "successfully screened for high levels" to be that high levels of antibiotics were found...? Doesn't "successfully screened for something e.g., X" mean that X was found? And obviously if high levels were found, then it's not safe to drink

Guess I'm learning that in this context, "successfully screened for something" means that the test passed/favorable result happened, in this case, no antibiotics.

I had chosen C even though I was hesitating about A

C is wrong because it's too weak for a resolve/explain question. it says "some" of the "large number" tagged made it outside, that could be just 2 birds made it out, so it's not an explanation. needs to get work done on its own

I took B to mean that the quality of the environment into which the fish are released was the same between both traditional and experimental environments, which would be needed otherwise if the traditional ones get released into a terrible environment and the experimental ones get released into a good environment, obviously the results would be skewed. But the statement is a general one that the environment impacts survival which is why the hatchery matters. if you negate, that the environment has a big impact on survival, the argument does not fall apart

B would be correct if it said teh quality is simliar between the two, but that's not what it says.

I'd also love to join if not too full!

D is more encompassing. If A is true, D is def true. If D is true, A is not necessarily true

also interested!

I chose A because I made the same assumption that was made for C - that there was less documentation from Caligula's reign BECAUSE of his enemies - that they burned the records showing that he wasn't cruel etc etc.

No looking back, just because they burned some of them, it doesn't explain the fact that the few that was passed down did still say he was cruel. This is what C addresses that A doesn't address, even C still requires a (imo) stretch of an assumption that the enemies made up his cruel acts. Thought we were only supposed to make reasonable assumptions, LSAC, and not have to rely on outside info (bc not all of us learn about the roman empire as our hobby)...

What is the "dark matter problem" referred to in the passage (and question 14)?

#help

For question 20, I somehow made answer choice C re:continents make sense over B during blind review by assuming that the ocean floor spreading resulted in the formation of continents, and thus basalt found on continents proves that spreading did occur. However, that assumption is incorrect- nowhere does the passage talk about continent formation. after some googling, can confirm that ocean floor spreading is different from continental formation (tectonic plates are different from continental plates/continents, and are under them). idk how my brained jumped to make that logical gap

incorrectly chose B because I failed to see the comparison was between teens and other population groups rather than teens who drink caffeinated bevs. too general. had nothing to do with bevs. why did i cross out A/miss it? either didn't read it thoroughly or saw B first and chose it