I am clicking next on this lesson and it brings me to a 404 page

Once you are done and have verified that you have marked that you have completed blind review, you should press a button that says something to the tune of "show answers" and your statistics should pop up. This should list [in order(and only whats important to me, at least)] type of question, how long you took on that question, the answer that you put (and highlighted in green or red depending on your success), the correct answer (seen in green), and the difficulty of that question.

Why does B hinge on the fact that FMRI's may or may not be labeled?

If you gain access to my genetic profile and my FMRI, what will it take for you to get to know who I am and essentially have my data leaked? For the FRMI, you do not need anything else to know that is me because you can reconstruct my face. For the genetic profile, you need a label for it to tell you that it belongs to me.

took my time and did two different drills. one on hard and i got 5/5 and one on easy after and i got 5/5. spent too much time on both sections though.

Maybe when y'all finally add the videos, you can skip these sections completely and focus on the ones where people are struggling. Teaching 20+ year olds what "overwhelming majority" and "most" mean is not only unnecessary but disparaging

It always matters! a contrapositive is just the same thing but reversed and negated. You have

A--->B (if A, then B) (if its in New York, its in the USA)

and

/B---->/A (if its not B, its not A) (if its not in the USA, it can’t be in New York)

do you see how this doesnt make sense for any other order?

EXAMPLES OF INCORRECT BELOW

A--->/B (if its in New York, its not in the USA)

/A---->B (if its not in New York, then its in the USA)

/B---->A if its not in the USA, its in New York

B---->/A if its in the USA, its not in New York

END INCORRECT EXAMPLES

so all you do is flip whats on either side of the arrow and negate them, hence

A--->B (if A, then B)

and

/B---->/A (if its not B, its not A)

I'm definitely not qualified to be answering this so take this with a grain of salt... I think, especially if your degree was writing intensive, it would still be beneficial to ask one of your professors from your actual undergraduate institution. The worst case scenario is that they say no, and the best case scenario is that they write you a letter that details your academic prowess (hopefully) and discusses how you were online so they did not know you personally. Sadly, this is just a reflection of you taking all of your courses online, not really that you did not go to office hours of try to get to know the professors. If you took four years to complete your undergraduate degree, and you are applying either straight out of that undergraduate degree or beyond, you’re talking about asking the law school admissions to consider a letter for someone that you had years ago -- and that is not necessarily a reflection of your work ethic or academic prowess now (and especially not rigor). I would consider, if possible, having two work references and one academic reference. I would also recommend getting a supervisor to write at least one of these letters. It is always better to have someone that oversaw your work directly rather than a colleague commenting on your abilities while not having direct access to what you did for PWC. I personally do not think that an addendum would be necessary either.