I am, of course, not up to the speed I want with lawgic. However, I started out taking my time on conditional reasoning questions and really forcing myself to write out the lawgic regardless of how intuitive the question was. This has been really helping me see lawgic as almost a second nature now and hopefully, it will allow me to work under test conditions.

I was doing well until I saw the "No" condition. Completely forgot what group it went into so I chose the "trap" answer of B. Looking over it again and writing it out in Lawgic knowing that the word "no" is a group 4 indicator makes it much clearer!

I would suggest to maybe review the logic/conditional chain section in the foundations section! Something I have found is that a good amount of LR questions have some element of conditional reasoning. Purposefully mapping out conditional statements, even if it may seem simple or redundant, will make you more comfortable in creating these important links during testing conditions!

Sometimes, I like to drill untimed with conditional reasoning tags. Within these drills I take the time to map out conditional statements and rewatch the explanation, regardless if I got the question right, to further understand Lawgic!

I am interested!