@aggieetyy341 this is the only explanation that makes sense!!!! essentially what you are saying is apply each answer choice to the conclusion. in simple terms: if the ac not exisiting would mean the argument still makes sense, then it should not be applied.

I genuinely do not understand why the answer to this is not B, is it because it says the ONLY way?? Or like WHY?

4/5 on normal, 5/5 on blind review. Man, it is a confidence booster once you learn the proper techniques and start using them, but it is definetly a struggle getting there.

@TekenaAbere this was so incredibly helpful thank you

While I do appreciate the grammar lessons, how much of a focus will these have on the actual LSAT rather than studying question types? It seems we've only covered 1 or 2 types of questions and are spending a great deal of time on the grammar portions.

@UnCoolDataPrivacyEsq I think bookmark and come back when you know the question types & how to solve?

4/5 but i genuinely don't understand how as I was confused the whole time! The main tactic I used was finding and labeling the conclusion or "argument" and then determining which answer choice would best fit the question based only on the identified argument.

I'm just a little confused identifying the difference premise vs context, I understand that premises support the argument, and context is background information, but in my mind those are the same.

3/5.. what i did wrong on question number two was obvious, because I identified the wrong conclusion, so how will I be able to better differentiate indicator words from the natural structure of a sentence?

@BrianBond I see what you mean... I tried to read for buildup in the argument instead of trying to fully understand the information that was in the paragraph. I believe this helped me because it allowed me to focus soley on if there is an argument present, and what part of the argument would serve as "eviddence" for the conclusion.