I think, given the nature of the LSAT, they want us to falsely make this assumption. Precluding one group does not imply that another group is included.
Hey! Im interested as well!
My bad, should have clarified, LR is the issue. Lawgic makes a lot of sense with LG, but with LR I can't see how making those "diagrams" are helpful given that I have such limited time. I also still do not understand how they are helpful in answering most questions (for LR).
Also, Im definitely not amazing at intuitively interpreting LR statements.
Ive become familiar with the system of translation but Im still struggling to understand the practical use of making the translations. Is it just that I can not do them fast enough yet? or is it something that I'm possibly missing? Any advice or tips would be appreciated, thanks!
How is D right?
The hotel being at 100% capacity seems to be the right answer to me as if the hotel is at 100% capacity no amount of decorations can better this number. Upgrading the decor, and thereby price, would have an ambiguous impact on % of the hotel occupied and the profits generated.
Admin Note: Edited the title. Please use the format PT#.S#.Q# (G#) - brief description of question.
@alyssamadelyn165 could you also message me pls? thanks!!!