trying to figure out why answer choice B is not correct. So we first find the word unless, and the sentence after the word unless we are suppose to negate it and make it sufficient correct? so if we negate it and make it sufficient then the other sentence is suppose to be the necessary and it should stay the same. so it would be transferred over into logic saying: IF the information is not accurate and does not concern public safety THEN the journalist editor will not order her to reveal the informants identity. so why is this not the correct answer. it thought the identity of the informant will be release if not true or is public safety. Thank you in advance!

i understand that psychology is science but how can i be certain that the studies done in passage B were scientific studies?

I am interested. I enjoy doing LR and LG. I would love for someone to tutor me. Thank u in advance. I struggle with assumption questions the most.

so when you negate all it will become some? can the negation of all be none?

#help (Added by Admin)

I'm confused as to why the last sentence, The fact is that, is not a conclusion indicator? Because of xy and z, the fact is that (we can conclude) traveling by car is in its self a major risk factor.

#help (Added by Admin)

Why is D the answer and not B? Is answer choice B a cause and effect? How does reducing pressure result to less percentage? Just because it’s a less pressure working environment doesn’t necessarily mean less people will work. I just can’t wrap my finger around this answer choice. Answer choice D says a decline in resources, okay so less people will be a decline in resources because less people are working? Why is B not the answer? B don’t explain why the number or the percentage is decrease

#help (Added by Admin)

i can do the process of elimination to conclude that answer choice A is the answer after completing my blind review. However, i find it difficult understanding how can we say the uncertainty is causing the person to be more stress, and the certainty is causing the person to be less stress. How can we say that one is causing the other? then would it be fair to say uncertainty is causing less pain, and certainty is causing more pain? why do we connect the level of certainty with the level of stress?

thank you, hopefully someone can understand what i am saying and its not too confusing?

#help (Added by Admin)

its as if the LSAT is changing its course whats going on basic rules are changing right before my eyes. must be a new lsat writer or this entire preptest is experimental section going wrong

okay im going to assume the LSAT has a new writer because of the term evidently being used as a conclusion indicator and also because of all these weird question types, feel like im taking a full section of the experimental today!