how is this not a strengthening question?

seriously?? do we know if this question was thrown out? the language in answer choice A is possibly the most devious deception I have seen the test writers use. can the grammar in that sentence not be interpreted to make that answer choice totally incorrect?

I initially got question 22 right but on blind review i ruled out D on 22 because of the phrase "ought most to concern themselves". as i analyzed the passage i struggled to find where and how, specifically, the author is claiming that historians/writers OUGHT/SHOULD concern themselves with how the law was intended to affect women. I can't find where the author is trying to persuade the reader of this. it seems expository and not persuasive to me. can anyone clarify?

this doesn't make any sense to me. there is no correlation between confidence and accuracy. and certain factors can affect confidence - BUT confidence IS NOT CORRELATED with accuracy. so why do we care if their confidence is affected? its not proven to affect their accuracy. can anyone point out how i have misinterpreted this?

i struggle with this because it seems it is the best strategy to take the LSATS wording as literal as possible throughout the test. for "funding to not be eliminated" to equal "adopting a policy" seems like WAY too much inference. I got the answer right first time, then changed it on BR because of this realization.

the phrase in the question is literally insufficient up until it is made sufficient by the last sentence. I don't understand why D is wrong. The teacher does not mention the adoption of a policy. i realize this is a difficult question - however, it seems more like a bad question to me.

How can A be true?

Could "not until" be a universal quantify for necessary condition?

Does "resides" belong to a universal Quantifiers group?