Admissions profile

LSAT

Not provided Goal score: 180

CAS GPA

Not provided

1L START YEAR

2027

Discussions

Lessons · Purpose of Passage Question (Greek Dramas)

jdelbosco

Monday, Mar 2

Was the Z. Barbu perspective just thrown in there to trick people into picking E? ie you just read the last sentence and then think its philisophical?

Lessons · Fast Track - Necessary Assumption

jdelbosco

Tuesday, Feb 24

@Ssss One thing that helped me when I was first starting with conditional logic is to map out every single question and answer that uses conditionals.

I would take a practice question under normal time control (ie try to answer efficiently), then on blind review, I would diagram the question, understand from that diagram what piece was missing that I should be looking for, then diagram all the answers, and understand why the wrong answers didn't fit/interact with the diagram of the question.

This will help you actively expose yourself to sufficiency/necessity, and you will soon be able to "diagram" mentally and see the missing pieces without having to put pen to paper.

Lessons · Lesson 1 - Jocko the Chimp (W)

jdelbosco

Edited Saturday, Jan 31

The Inception of 7Sage LSAT lessons

Lessons · Some Before All - Formal Argument #4

jdelbosco

Thursday, Jan 22

Another good visualization is combining the venn diagrams from previous some sections with the set & superset visualization from the beginning of foundations:

A and B have overlapping venn diagrams.

--- ( A () B )

B is also a subset of the C superset.

--- ((B) C )

---Where the parentheses are the subset within superset bubbles used in previous videos

This means that A is overlapping with C in the same way that A is overlapping with B

--- ( A ( ( ) B ) C ) [kind of hard to illustrate without the actual circles]

LSAT · Unique Situation - Seeking Advice on Study Plan

jdelbosco

Monday, Jan 12

@Kevin_Lin Thank you for the recommendation!

LSAT

•

Monday, Jan 12

jdelbosco

Unique Situation - Seeking Advice on Study Plan

Hi everyone!

My name is Jackson, and I have a little bit of an unorthodox path.

I'm 27, and have worked in Corporate Finance for the last 5 years. For a multitude of reasons, I have committed to a career change, and am now studying for the LSAT, with plans to take the test in June, apply in the fall, and begin in Fall 2027.

I took a timed practice test with no prep prior to building out a study plan and scored a 165 (LR -7, RC -9). With that, 7Sage recommended 19 weeks of Just Practice, meaning no lessons, just answering/reviewing/analyzing questions. However, I am a little worried that I don't totally understand the underlying concepts and am getting by on intuition (e.g. Upon reviewing questions I got correct, I don't totally understand the underlying analysis/explanation).

Should I opt for an Accelerated path to ensure I have exposure to the fundamental concepts? Should I supplement that with PTs on the weekends during the Non-Practice phase for a hybrid approach? Or should I just go with the Just Practice approach?

Thank you for spending the time to read through this. Any and all feedback is appreciated!