I generally really find the videos helpful, however - at 1:10 - 2:39, switching out the question stem from a weakening question to the RRE stem way more confusing for someone who studies by copying notes by hand.
Not having the final sentence of the stimulus was an awkward choice.
This explanation threw me off completely. I feel that there should be another one.
Why did you add information? Can you explain without having to add that sentence? I say this because what if a person doesn't assume the conclusion you assumed? Now the thought process could change. IDK, maybe I'm reading too much into it.
First time commenting, this video needs to be redone or removed. JY uses both circles and slashes to mark entirely different things here and it's not consistent. This is such a confusing lesson.
I understand why it was done this way, but I have to say it adds a deep level of confusion to keep restructuring the question into different types. It does help to deepen our understanding of the differences between question types, but having that be the very beginning of the video generates needless confusion. It might be better to save that restructuring for the end of the video, to be used for comparison sake, once everyone understands what the correct answer is, and why.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
71 comments
i would give jocko many bananas
changing this Q to an RRE format just made it way more confusing IMO
This explanation is beyond confusing.
soooo confused...
I generally really find the videos helpful, however - at 1:10 - 2:39, switching out the question stem from a weakening question to the RRE stem way more confusing for someone who studies by copying notes by hand.
Not having the final sentence of the stimulus was an awkward choice.
So when you weaken your attack the assumption correct? or the line of reasoning to the conclusion?
The Inception of 7Sage LSAT lessons
wth are we even talking about here?
okay so im not the only one that felt a little lost by the explanation haha. the written ones are great but the video made me feel more confused.
my guy, this was not your best work.
This explanation threw me off completely. I feel that there should be another one.
Why did you add information? Can you explain without having to add that sentence? I say this because what if a person doesn't assume the conclusion you assumed? Now the thought process could change. IDK, maybe I'm reading too much into it.
we need some more of Kevins versions. obvi shout JY for doing all these, but I have a preference for Kevins explanations, less confusion imo lol
Justice for Jocko
First time commenting, this video needs to be redone or removed. JY uses both circles and slashes to mark entirely different things here and it's not consistent. This is such a confusing lesson.
ape shall not bark at ape
long ahh video
Jocko was given a single banana.
Good.
I really do appreciate the humor in these lessons, helps to lighten the stress a little
Apes Together Strong
Is there any way to see the level difficulty of this question?
[This comment was deleted.]
I understand why it was done this way, but I have to say it adds a deep level of confusion to keep restructuring the question into different types. It does help to deepen our understanding of the differences between question types, but having that be the very beginning of the video generates needless confusion. It might be better to save that restructuring for the end of the video, to be used for comparison sake, once everyone understands what the correct answer is, and why.
I am still super confused, which answer was the correct answer choice?
Cheeky
I remember this Q type from my diagnostic