User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

@ There will be more admissions webinars to come!

That's good to hear; I have a solid personal essay, but it does need work. Especially now that I got my score back....

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

Also, is there a chance this same webinar would be offered at a later date?

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

@ All webinars are free.

Ah, I'm a dumb-dumb. So, if I purchase this Admissions starter package, I can watch it at anytime at my convenience?

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

@ If that is your dream, I am of the opinion that you should definitely go for it. Shoot for the moon, then work backwards after you've given it your best shot.

As for PTs, did you already do the ones before 60? If so, I think the idea above about giving yourself less time for retakes a great strategy.

I've done 60-77 2x for tests, and one additional time for drilling; so I've seen each of those sections 3x

I've drilled the first 10 tests, and have tested 40-60 2x or have drilled sections of it. Haven't done 11-30....would those still give me an accurate gauge of where I'm at considering they are much older? I've always read those are better for drilling and learning how to do the test.

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

To clarify, is this webinar free?

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

@ You never get a second chance to make a first impression. It is best to apply with a higher LSAT score. September take will still allow you to apply VERY early in the cycle.

I'm going to dig around for a fresh PT (I've already pounded the hell out of 60-78), and try to make a decision for a retake off of that score.

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

@

@

First off congrats on the 169, that's an excellent score!

Second, to echo what others have said, take some time to decide what your plan from here is. I would definitely recommend not ruling out the retake entirely, but if you think you'd just spin your wheels for MAYBE a 1 point bump...definitely not worth it. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but provided you're over a school's 75th percentile LSAT I don't think they'd care about the difference between a 169 and 170.

However, if you decide on a retake, get your apps completely done so when your Sept. score comes back you can send them immediately

Thanks Ron Swanson!

I've heard an equal number of stories of people who say they change their lives by retaking and those who said they wish they hadn't put themselves through the stress of it again for a one or two point bump. What makes me hesitant to retake is that I've been in the 167-171 range for about 8 months, and I've already done many retakes so I have virtually zero fresh material left. I went through LSAT 60 this morning, and I remembered many of the problems. I'll try to find an older test from the 30s or 40s I haven't taken, take that this Saturday, and use it as a gauge for if I should continue.

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

Let it ride unless you're deadset on Yale; even then you still may get in

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

You've only done 15 practice tests? Do more of those and you'll probably get the score increase you're looking for

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

If I retake and the the score is lower than a 169, will it hurt my admissions chances?

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

@ First of all, great score. Congrats on scoring so well.

You most definitely can. Apply with what you have, but do let the schools know that you are re-writing so that they know you'll be submitting a fresh new score.

Thanks for the advice; I guess I don't have to make my decision right now....maybe some sleep will be able to help me out.

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

My reasons for not retaking - I've already done LSATs 60-77 2x; never scored above a 171 on a fresh test and was stuck in the 167-171 range for 8 months, and feel like I'd just be spinning my wheels; I honestly can't imagine putting myself through the ringer again

My reasons for retaking - I don't want to give up on my dream of going to Harvard/be a 175+ scorer; I've already put in a year, might as well get more out of a year's worth of studying than a 169

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

I'm honestly starting to lean towards not retaking. It'd be great to get into Penn or Duke, but I might do ED at Northwestern and get that 150k scholarship.

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

Can I apply in September with the 169, and then submit whatever my new score is after applying?

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Tuesday, Jun 28 2016

@ No harm in a retake. Prep for September and give it a shot.

Do you think it will matter if I do certain tests for a third time? It's been 3 1/2 weeks since I've studied, so it's a decent break in time

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Tuesday, Jun 28 2016

P.S. I was also amped and stressed out of my mind for the test....now that I know what to expect, and already have a decent score under my belt, I wonder if I would do better?

User Avatar

Tuesday, Jun 28 2016

joecarterruskey902

169; worth retaking?

Context - I spent a year studying for the LSAT; never made it past the 167-171 range on a fresh test, but got as high as a 178 on a retake. I took the June LSAT for my first official take, and scored a 169. I'd obviously love to score a 180 and go to Harvard, but if that's not feasible then my next ideal place to go would either be Penn or Duke. My GPA is a 3.66.

Test Breakdown:

LR: 23/25, 23/26 (left one blank!!! Had no idea I did this); this is a pretty typical breakdown for me though

AR: 21/23; I usually go -0

RC: 23/27; this is the crazy one, as I usually went 19 or 20 out of 27. Because of this score, I feel like I should be happy with I got.

With that said, what if I had gotten those two additional games questions correct, and had answered the forgotten LR question? Maybe the RC was a fluke on this occasion, but an additional 2 1/2 months could make that score more consistent.....

However, I have used all of the testing materials, and I did score smack dab in my average. Is chugging out retakes for the next few months worth it for a couple of additional points? I don't know, which is why I ask for the wisdom of 7sage.

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Sunday, Jun 26 2016

I think spending a lot of time reading those magazines isn't a great way to study. Sure, it's good supplemental material, but at the end of the day the way to get better with RC is to do more RC passages, and there are plenty of them. Plus, redoing them is how I started to get a handle on the section.

User Avatar

Monday, Apr 25 2016

joecarterruskey902

Caffeine and the LSAT

Hey, so I'm a big fan of using caffeine to study with the LSAT (specifically caffeine pills). Will I be allowed to bring those into the test with me, or would they be confiscated? I've heard different answers.

User Avatar

Tuesday, May 24 2016

joecarterruskey902

Burnout Right Before the Test

So, I've been studying for the LSAT for exactly a year. I've taken almost 50 practice tests during that time. For the past 2 months, I've been taking 2-3 practice tests a week and BRing them (with a one week break during that time). I've never gotten past a 171 on a first take, and a 177 on a retake. I guess I am exhausted and frustrated. I

I'm at a point where I'm not sure if it would be more effective to take a brief break or to continue grinding. My planned study schedule is the following:

today - finish BR of PT 65, drill RC

tomorrow - PT 72

Thursday - BR, drill RC

Friday - PT 67 retake

Saturday - off

Sunday - BR, drill RC

Monday - PT 76 retake

Tuesday - BR, drill RC

Wednesday - PT 75 retake

Thursday - BR, drill RC

Friday - off

Saturday - lightly drill PT 74

Sunday - lightly drill PT 74

I'm tempted to take the rest of today off, and do a retake tomorrow to boost my confidence instead of PT 72 (since I've heard this is an especially difficult LSAT). Thoughts?

I did want a 180, but I don't know how feasible that is or if I'm capable of making a breakthrough within the next few days. Right now I just want to be able to score in the 170s for the real thing and avoid having to do a retake.

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Friday, Jun 24 2016

@, do you know if law schools call all of your employers?

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Friday, Jun 24 2016

@, can you please elaborate? So you took the June LSAT and knew that you were going to take the September one? Why not wait and see what score you got first?

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Thursday, Jun 23 2016

@, didn't you already take the LSAT?

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Thursday, Jun 23 2016

Wait, how are you filling out applications already? Can we start working on them?

User Avatar

Thursday, Apr 21 2016

joecarterruskey902

Redoing the Most Recent Tests vs. Doing Older Ones

Context: I've been studying for about 10 months; have done all of the tests except for the 7 most recent ones, and have started to retake many tests I've already done. I've found on retakes I can score in the 174-176 range, and learn quite a bit from seeing the patterns in the test. For the last stretch of my study period I was going to do two retakes a week(think tests from the 2003-2006 range) and one fresh test a week from the most recently released ones (2012-2015) to gauge my progress.

However, I had an epiphany; screw gauging my progress!

I've been stuck in the 166-171 range for 6 months. I know what I'm going to get on a fresh test. So, perhaps it would be worthwhile for me to take these fresh recently released tests twice instead of just once. Granted, the scores closest to my test date will probably be inflated, but I feel like that this is a better learning opportunity versus just seeing those problems on one take and a blind review.

With that said, I'd be taking a test for the first time, and then retaking aprox. 3 weeks later. Maybe that's too soon, or maybe it doesn't matter?

n case I wasn't clear, this is what I mean as an example:

Example of a week in scenario 1:

Retake Oct. 2003, BR it

Take Oct. 2013 for the first time, BR it

Retake Oct. 2006, BR it

Example of a week in scenario 2:

Take Oct. 2013, BR it

Take Dec. 2013, BR it

Take June 2014, BR it

Then, three weeks later, retake those same tests and BR them again

So, the last 7-9 tests I will have taken before the official exam will all be retakes. While this may not give me an accurate assessment of where I stand, it may be a better learning experience (seeing the most recent problems four times in total instead of just twice), and maybe the inflated score will be good for my confidence, and be more beneficial in the long run than scoring a 169 or a 170 just days before the test.

My intuition is telling me to try this out, as regardless I will be doing mostly retakes in the next few weeks.

What are your thoughts?

User Avatar

Monday, May 02 2016

joecarterruskey902

How to Tackle RC

I've been stuck in the 166-171 range for 8 months or so now, and do retakes in the 174-176 range.

I typically miss 2-4 in LR, and 0-3 in games.

However, my RC is all over the place. There have been times where I've gone -0, and others (like most recently) where I've missed as many as 8 or 9.

I started doing the Puzzle Theory (piecing all of the answers together), and writing a brief statement summarizing each paragraph. These helped initially, but not as much anymore.

I also understand that all of the answers are in the passage, but I'm finding the answer choices so convoluted that I can't find them. With that said, I typically finish RC with a few minutes of extra time.

How do I properly review RC? What can I do to get better?

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Thursday, Jun 02 2016

One more comment on my end - it's probably best not to even think about "what score am I going to get" or "how can I determine based off of my past practice tests what I'll get"?

Show up, rock the test, and then worry about what you got/look for clues in your past takes for some sort of indicator. Showing up to the big game with an idea of how you'll do can be good, but it can also mentally lock you in and focused on something that is ultimately a waste of energy.

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Thursday, Jun 02 2016

@ I think the -3 is a great anticipatory score as it helps people to analyze if they are really ready to take the test.

I guess that's one way to look at it; if you'd be happy with a score 3 points below your average or whatever. But I think that's a pretty dangerous mindset to have going into the test.

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Thursday, Jun 02 2016

@ The point I'm gathering from this thread is that, of course it can happen. But don't count on it. If you're PTing properly, your PT average is a good indicator of where you're at. If it happens its bonus points. Agree with above comments that if you need it to happen to be happy with your score, you should really consider postponing.

I think that should be the takeaway of this entire thread

User Avatar
joecarterruskey902
Friday, Jul 01 2016

FYI I've decided I'm going full throttle; I'll regret it the rest of my life if I don't give it another shot

Confirm action

Are you sure?