I know in the core curriculum, it's pretty heavily emphasised that you should do the logical reasoning curricula before moving on, but I have my LR scores in an okay place, whereas my logic games is consistently the weakest part of my scores. So I think it makes the most sense for me to jump in with Logic Games to get myself to the same level as I perform with LR, but would this be a mistake? Will I spend a lot more time than necessary on LG material without the LR core?
For context, on the Feb. 1997 prep-test I scored 18/25 on both LR sections, and 8/24 on LG. So I can stand to review LR obviously, but I want to start with what I have to improve the most on.
I'm planning to take the August exam, aiming to go from a ~160 to ~170. I took the exam last July, and I was hoping to get more studying done during the school year, but ended up overwhelmed by coursework and changing my major, and haven't really done much outside of breaks during the school year. However, I'm hoping to study abroad in the fall, so I want to be done with this exam by the time classes start back up. I'm also going to lose access to the course material around september, because I procrastinated way too much, so I don't want to pay a bunch in extensions if I don't need to.