Congrats Nicole!

I actually had the same question the first time I did this PT a couple weeks ago (before the group BR schedule came out) and talked to @ about it. If I still understand it correctly, he explained that evidence should be thought of as "reason to believe" and not necessarily hard facts. So when A says, the argument concluded that "there is evidence against the hypothesis" it can be read as "the argument concluded there is reason to believe the hypothesis is false."

In D, the premises don't really contradict the conclusion, the conclusion just doesn't think the premises are true.

Hope that helps. Not sure if there's more to the reasoning that I missed.

I'll join the BR groups on Wednesday and Saturday night, thanks!

I'll be there Saturdays as well!

@ just to clarify, will it now just be the Saturday BR calls until the new BR group starts up? (as in not the Tuesday and Thursday calls?)

Yes, I'm interested!

Thank you for these notes!

I'm interested in all of them, thank you!

Thank you for setting up this schedule. I'm interested in joining the June BR group. I'm only working part time while I study, so my schedule is pretty flexible. I started studying in August and have done 8 PTs, but since my scores are still in the 150s, I'm considering going through the course again and maybe rereading the Trainer-- so not sure if I'll make the first couple weeks of BR, but I'll be in touch.