With less than a month until the Nov LSAT, I'd like to make my PT's as "real" as the real thing. Any advice on this? I will be using an iPad.
Thanks all, and happy studying.
If you have time after a LG section and you're missing a few on silly errors, then I'd advise you to take that extra time and eliminate more A/Cs - especially on the questions that were tough for you. I did this, and I started going -1 to -0 more often!
@ thanks for your note, will do. wakanda forever.
@ the consensus seems to be reading for structure > reading for details. I think my issue is lack of practice and trying to learn everything the author is saying. Sometimes I forget to actively read (especially during timed constraints). I'll consider your advice, thanks so much for your note!
@ I don't, sorry bud, i didn't use any tutors. I do know that @ has awesome study sessions that she offers. I haven't joined any yet, but I hope to before my exam in 2 months.
With less than a month until the Nov LSAT, I'd like to make my PT's as "real" as the real thing. Any advice on this? I will be using an iPad.
Thanks all, and happy studying.
Hi, all.
I'm barely scraping a 154 (138 cold diag), and after choking on the exam yesterday, I've decided to delay a year and take the July exam.
My typical breakdown is as follows:
LG: -4 LR: -10 LR: -10 RC: -13, I can BR up to about 164
I plan to continue to fool-proof games until I can consistently go -1 or -0, I think this is very realistic for me considering I started at -18 on games. I will restart the CC on LR and RC, I am missing a lot of basic fundamental skills.
I've burned through a lot of the recent PT's, does anyone have advice on how to start over? I have about 5 months until the July test, I'm really hoping to sit down and really learn the test. I really feel like if I learned LR like I've learned LG, I could break into the high 160's. Please let me know if this is a pipe dream lol.
Thanks to all!
@ I really like this, I'm going to try it during my practice and get back to you in PMs! thanks for your advice, brother.
I think it's definitely possible. I would say 160-165 is possible even in just a month of you are 1) full time (20-30 hours of week of studying), and studying the right way. The bulk of those 4 months will likely be trying to escape the dreaded 165 into the 170s.
Especially if you're getting a tutor, I think it's very possible. Having someone by your side and teaching you how to attack certain questions/sections is very valuable.
Good luck and you got this :)
I will be 27, I feel a little behind. I didn't expect to work for 3-4 years after college. I hope it is not an invasive question. Happy to hear about stories about why you are going to law school at this time. :)
[Admin note: edited title for clarity]
@ @ It definitely was not 2 years of straight studying.
I would say that my progress (138-160) is achievable in 4 maybe 5 months of 20-25 hours per week. I am a slow learner, so I definitely think 3 months is possible.
I've taken about 4 PT's, but MANY timed sections. For LR, I stopped doing stuff timed. I spent a whole month learning LR all over again, and doing stuff untimed making sure that I know the material. After getting about -2 untimed, I slowly started doing 5 questoins in 5 minutes, and then 10 in 10. This REALLY helped my score go up from about -12 on LR to -6. I'm still workin on it!
Hi all,
I've made some pretty respectable progress since the beginning of my LSAT journey. I went from 138 to the low 160s.
My improvements were:
LR -15 to about -6 (My BR is -2 to -3)
Games: -18 to about -2 (I can go -0 depending on mistakes or not, I make really stupid reading mistakes like assuming that its MBT when it says MBF"
RC: I average -13 (weakest section) and can't get any better, although i don't really practice this.
With only 4-5 weeks left, what should I focus on if I'm trying to score 165+? I want to drill RC for 1-2 weeks to see if I can turn that -13 to to a -7, but I'm not sure if that would be the greatest use of my time. I do 10 in 10 pretty well for LR, but questions 13-20 really stump me.
Open to any advice on how to get the most gains in 4 weeks, considering the information above.
Thanks i love you all, and thanks for reading!
PS: Reschedule isn't an option, I've put this darn test off for like 2 years already. I'm really proud of my improvement so far and want to be done with the LSAT by this Nov. 165+ is the goal, I would be happy with 163-164!
RC isn't my favorite section. I get anywhere from 10-16 right, 13-14 would be an accurate average for me on RC.
It's important to mention that I've never practiced it (going to do it when I get there in the CC). Is it possible to go from averaging 13-14 to about 20 right on RC after finishing the CC? I'm wondering because I've heard so many people say RC is tough to improve on because it's something that a person was taught there whole lives and can't be improved in a matter of months.
How much did you improve on RC after finishing the CC?
I only finish about 3 passages by the way, I usually run out of time while reading the 4th.
Thanks!!!
hey all!
I am at an average of 160 on my PTs with the following breakdown:
-0 Games
-6 Per LR, sometimes less, sometimes more.
-13 on RC
If I improved my RC, it could totally push me into the 165 range. With only 7 weeks left until the Jan exam, I'm seeking advice on the best way to improve my RC score. Advice on LR is welcomed, too!
Thanks all!
I would only retake a 172 if you have mastered games. I'd run with the 172! Congrats, super impressive, and you'll do great!
Reach out whenever, I'm not a tutor but i've been on 7sage and had a lot of success from it. Happy to talk over discord or phone.
Hi all-
I'm in the middle of full-proofing, and sometimes I come across a game that's categorized as "MISC" and they always give me a really hard time. How have you all approached these type of games? Do they get easier as I finish full-proofing? (I'm only on section 5 of 35)
Thanks.
Please let me know your thoughts! I don't work for the LSAC, so I know that I'm not a professional. I thought writing a few questions would help my LR studies. If you have time, please let me know what you think, how hard it was, how easy it was, where I made a mistake, etc, thanks!
Heart disease, also known as cardiovascular disease,
is one of the leading causes of death in Country X.
Studies show that individuals who eat a diet high in
trans-fats have a higher chance of being diagnosed with
heart disease. Burritos, a popular Mexican entree commonly
consumed by in Country X, contain high calories. Therefore,
a person who consumes burritos regularly has a higher
chance of being diagnosed with cardiovascular disease.
The argument relies on assuming which one of the following?
A) People of Country X generally know that burritos are unhealthy
B ) If all people eat burritos less, they would invariably be healthier
C) In country X, eating foods with high calories will raise one’s trans-fat
consumption by at least some amount
D) Eating any food with high calories will result in heart disease
E) Generally, refraining from a high fat diet is better than a diet that
includes a high amount of fat
I'm leaning towards delaying. I'd like to be at a 165 but I'm barely scraping 160, which means if I took the text next week I could get a 160, but I also could have a bad test and be in the 150's. For me, a late 160-165, is better than an on time 155. Especially if you're gonna retake anyway.
Consider postponing and dont feel bad about it. $200 is a lot, but the extra points you could receive because you're better prepared could get you scholarship that would pay you back 10 times over.
I score from -1 to -4 depending if there's a MISC game or not.
But to address your question, I think it's really important to check all the A/C'cs, if it wouldn't eat up more than 30 seconds or so. Some A/C's can be knocked out super quick, and in that case, I would check A/C's.
The reason is because you don't want to give up a point just because you're lazy. Consider this:
Speed on LG comes from knowing how to attack most games and doing it the most efficient way, so that you have the time to check each A/C. If you know how to do each type of game fast and the right way, you should have more than enough time to consider all the A/C's (on most questions)
Learn how to master game boards, game types; learn how to attack each question type the RIGHT way, and you'll find that you will have the luxury to check the A/C for most question types.
Going from 155 untimed to 165 TIMED would be really hard. I don't think it's impossible, but it is unlikely. I'd argue that your untimed score would/should be in the 170s if you want a 165 timed score.
With 2 months until the Jan exam, my guesstimation is that you could probably hit 160 timed, but even this would take some hard work. If you want to hit 165 timed, i'd suggest extending until March.
Hi there!
First of all, your LG and RC scores are so good! Great job on that.
LR was one of my weaker sections, too, and considering you are at -9 to -13, I would say that you are missing the core foundation skills of LR.
I also had this problem! I have improved in LR by returning to the CC and really learning all the question types and how to attack each type. Then I would suggest doing LR questions untimed to make sure you really have those LR solving skills. I truly believe it is a waste of time to do LR timed when you are missing more than 4 or 5 per section. So try to do LR sections untimed until you can get to -4 to -2, and then incorporate time!
Bryce, if you can get a 3.5 gpa in undergrad, I'm pretty confident that you can score a 160-165 with about 4 months of full time studying. You have a good gpa, don't waste that, and definitely don't give up on law school because of a low LSAT. It's a 100% learnable exam.
I just took the Jan LSAT at USF (University of San Francisco), and the tables were TINY. It was very hard to do logic games because of the limited space. The tablet already took up half of the table!
I don't think this negatively affected my score, however, it was really annoying and I wanted to give you all a tip so this can potentially avoided for you all. I do understand that sometimes the LSAC will assign you test centers that you didn't choose (this happened to me, I actually chose College of San Mateo which is a great testing center).
TLDR: Avoid USF testing center, tables were super small.
yo tf was that last game? was it EDIT I could not even deduce.
oh well.
There is an option to "waitlist", but should I? I don't see a problem with taking the test in November instead (I get 4 extra weeks of studying :). But I am worried about applying in December versus November, will applying in Dec versus Nov make or break my app?
Thanks!
I have 1 official score from 2017 (should not have even bothered with the test)
and I have 1 cancel from the Jan 2018 exam. I cancelled after feeling like I bombed the test. Does this second attempt count as a "take"
I'm scheduled to take the exam in 2 weeks, which would be my third attempt, but only my second official score. I'm worried because I'm open to taking the January 2020 test in the event that I do not reach my goal score in November, and I don't want too many "attempts" to ruin my chances of getting into law school. Any thoughts?
Hey all,
I am working through the LG portion of the CC while fool-proofing. This by far has been the best way to learn and master LG. Its only been a week and I feel like I'm learning so much.
I have a question for those who have finished fool-proofing.
I'm spending about 4 hours a day purely focused on LG and fool-proofing 5-6 days a week. I honestly do not see it taking longer than a month at this rate, but please let me know if I am wrong.
Cheers and thanks in advance :)
Hi Kimberly, I'm just curious as to what your test scores are versus your BR scores?
Thanks for all the comments and kind words, really bringing tears to my eyes!
If anyone has questions please DM me so it's a little easier for us to communicate!
@ said:
This is really nice to hear! I'm currently stuck at a 150 and felt like I would never improve but your post gave me some motivation! So for the first half of your PT's did you take them untimed?
Hey, please message me and I can try to help you!
Hi all,
Thanks in advance for taking the time to read and answer my post.
I have scored a 138 on my diagnostic, took the December 2017 lsat and got 147.
I was averaging 146 with a high of 152.
I work full time at a very busy litigation firm as a litigation paralegal. It was very hard to make time to study. I enrolled in a testmasters course but didn’t really learn much. I was always so drained after work to absorb anything he instructor said.
I’m planning on taking 4 months off of work to focus full time on the exam to retake (and use the 7sage LSAT program).
Is it possible to get to the 160-170 range?
I’ve mistakingly exhausted the last 20 practice tests.. didn’t realize that was a mistake until I came across 7sage. Considering this, will the 7sage course still be useful for me?
Thanks again.
I was sitting down at a hotel lobby getting ready to take my first LSAT ever. I remember reading huge words and arguments and thought to myself: "Ok, I will never be a lawyer, this is only the entrance exam and I can barely shake it, how am I ever going to be an attorney?
I got a 138, and only about 5 questions right on Logic games. After studying for about 3 months, (not very many hours per week) I finally took a official LSAT and got a 147. I needed a 155 to have a decent shot at the regional school I wanted to attend - I got denied.
Fast forward a year and I study for a few more weeks, thinking I only need a little bit of improvement to scrape together that 155. I was wrong, I took another official test but cancelled because I knew I wasn't going to get that 155. At this point I thought I was NEVER going to law school.
I came across J.Y., his amazing team, and this amazing group of people here on 7sage. I decided to quit my job and dedicate 6 full months to really learn the LSAT, like from the bottom up. I mastered games first through full-proofing and then LR, and then on to RC. My highest PT was 161 and that's what I actually got on game day.
With my new and improved 161 score, I was accepted into the school that previously denied me, and I was awarded $100,000 in scholarship to attend. 2 years ago when I applied with my 147, I would have been ECSTATIC to attend even if I had to pay full sticker price. I am a firm believer that when one door closes, another one opens, with the condition that you work hard and never give up!
These are my tips for anyone who thinks they can't learn the LSAT, and advice for anyone considering delaying a cycle for a stronger LSAT.
Thanks for reading, I've been waiting months/years to make this post. Please reach out with any questions!
TLDR: Went from 138 and thinking I was never going to be a lawyer to accepted with a 161 and having about 2/3 of my tuition paid.
Hi there. IMO, deciding to cancel depends largely on (1) your goal score relative to your average scores; (2) when you need/want to start law school; (3) your responsibilities outside of learning the LSAT.
Going from an average of 160 to 140 is a significant drop but not unheard of. You may be experiencing a bit of burn out. Make sure to give your mind and body rest from the LSAT.
Honestly, you can't learn much more from now until Friday (I assume that's the day of the exam). If you're going to take it Friday, I highly suggest you just take 1 PT on Wednesday, review it carefully, take Thursday off, and take the real thing Friday. However, rescheduling would depend on the factors above. You can PM me if you want to chat.
Hi everyone. Sorry that I haven't replied to any messages or comments since I began law school. It has been a very busy last 2 years.
I wanted to revisit this forum because I really appreciated the community here at 7sage. It is crazy to realize that I start 3L about 2 weeks. If anyone is interested to know how my "journey" has been since I finished the LSAT, please reach out some way and I would be happy to share my law school experience. Please provide any questions you may have. I want to continue to motivate and give back to this community because I would not be where I am today without 7Sage. Thanks for your time.
I missed this question because I failed to see where exactly the flaw was. I picked A because I thought the sub conclusion does not support the major conclusion, but it does.
The error in this argument is in the sub conclusion:
For example,
P: All cultures believe that people should protect their families
SC: So we can hide our "guilty" family members from the police sometimes
You have to ask yourself, does this match up? Definitely not! Why? There could be OTHER morals that many people would prioritize over helping family members. such as: "We as a society must always assist cops in seeking justice" (this is just an example, but it is clearly what B is suggesting, which is an error in this argument)
A) is wrong because the sub conclusion DOES support the major conclusion, that's why its not a flaw.
I am planning on (re)starting my LSAT studies soon for the November 17th, 2018 LSAT. This will give me about 4-5 months of FULL time studying. With that considered, which package should I buy?
Here is a little background info about myself in case it helps you answer my question.
Cold Diag 138.
Highest PT of 152
Official Score of 147 (studied for about 1 month, was very busy with full time job)
I am aiming for 160-165 , do you all believe this is possible to obtain with 4-5 months of full time studying?
Please feel free to drop any pointers, tips, and pieces of advice that might help me on my 4-5 month study journey.
Thanks all!
Hi, all,
I've taken about a 4 month break from the LSAT do to personal reasons and just simply giving up. However, I am proud to announce that I am back and aiming to take the October 2019 LSAT.
Considering the LSAT is now digital, how should I resume? I was floating around the 155 range when I stopped and my break down was as follows:
Games: -2 to -6 on games (I've had perfect sections once or twice)
LR: -11 on the easier LR and -12-13 on the harder LR (My BR isn't much higher, i really need to work on my LR foundation)
RC: -15 on RC - Never really practiced this, I plan to go through the CC portion or the LSAT trainer on this section.
I'm aiming for 160, but please let me know what a reasonable jump is in about 15-16 weeks.
Any advice is MUCH appreciated, I am also open to PM's. THANKS!
Hi all,
I'm stumbling across 7sage's law school instruction videos. (Crim, civ pro, property, etc.) and was wondering a few things.
Thanks for your time, all!
I know that applying in Feb as opposed to November decreases one's chances of getting accepted, but does this affect the amount of scholarship money one might get? For example, lets say someone that was accepted is offered 60k, could that person have been offered more if they applied sooner? Is there like a certain amount of funds schools can give out that is given out on a rolling basis? Thanks :)
heads up, I am having issues making problem sets in LR. LG seems to be fine. (both Microsoft edge and Chrome)
This is unfortunate. Those free youtube explanations were exactly what lead me to being an Ultimate + member on this life-changing website. Shame shame shame. Thanks for letting us know JY.
I'm almost done with the LG section in the CC and I've been full-proofing as I go. I am definitely getting better and I'm very excited about that.
However, I just came across the snake/lizard game and literally stopped doing LG after a 4 hour day of LG. It was so demoralizing.
How often do we see games this difficult? And please spare me embarrassment if this game is actually an easy game :)
I hope everyone is having a great week. The fall weather is starting to come around here in beautiful San Jose, CA.
Anyway, I am thinking of postponing my 2nd take to January rather than November. I don't feel like I'm ready. I need a 156-157 to feel comfortable about getting into my target school and I feel as if I'm barely scratching 150. There is just over 6 weeks left until the November exam.
What do yall think? Take November and see if I can hit a 156, and just take the January exam if not? Or sit out the November exam and take the January one.
Thanks, all.
Hey all,
Before 7sage, I studied with another program and exhausted through PT's 60-80. (not all of them were used as full length PT's, some were used for timed sections).
How reliable will my scores for PT 60-80 be since it will be the second time I look at the questions? It's been a year since i've looked at PTs 60-80, so I'm hoping my mind wont recall everything 100%, and maybe the scores I receive the second time around could be somewhat reliable.
Not sure if this fact will help at all.. but I was getting like 145-150 on those PT's (lol) and 50% on the sections. (yeah i know, what a waste of PT's)
Any thoughts?
Hi all,
I've been spending weeks full-proofing games, and I have neglected LR as a result. My LR is very weak, and I am finishing only about 18 out of 25 or 26 questions on average and getting only 13/18 correct.
My BR score isn't much better, I'm able to get a total of about 17 of 25 after BR.
I scored 151 on PT 70 with a BR of 161.
The break down is as follows:
LG: 17/23 (23/23BR)
LR 1: 15/25 (17/25 BR)
LR 2: 14/25 (17/26 BR)
RC: 12/27 (18/27 BR)
My goal is 156-157. I am confident in my ability to get my LG consistently at -3, but is it possible to see an increase in LR in 2-3 weeks?
Thanks for reading, this post is quite long.
LR is hard for me because my reading comprehension skills are not that good.
I believe my average is about 14 correct per LR section. How do I get this to 18+? I've been through the trainer..finished most of the LR in the CC and I am still so bad at LR.
I want to move on to the LG section of the CC, however, I feel like that's a bad idea because I'd be abandoning LR too soon. I want to be decent at LR before I move onto LG.
Some of y'all are so good at LR.. when I see people say that they get "-2 or -1" on LR.. it amazes me. You rock.
How complete or incomplete are each of these courses? Since you are still adding videos to certain sections, I'm wondering if the videos that are currently available (purchased version) are sufficient to help a 1L with their 1L year.
Thanks 7sage!
Tomorrow, I start my 15-16 week LSAT journey. I should be very active on this forum, and I'm looking forward to sharing conversations with you all. Any tips for my journey are welcomed.
Lets get it.
The LSAT has 3 sections; LR, RC, and LG, but there is a 4th "section" to this exam and it's the toughest one - time.
I'm having trouble with timing myself, but a lot of people, and myself, would agree that timing can be defeated by mastery. Your BR scores are great, but try to get them higher. I'm confident you will see a natural score increase by getting a higher BR score. After you've gained some more mastery on the exam through a higher BR, you can then start implicating timing strategies on LR such as 5 in 5 or 10 in 10, and for LG such as doing the local questions first to have more game boards for the global questions!