Same!

I'm still learning myself, but I eliminated Answer Choice B because it seemed to flip the conditional around.

The stimulus says: well-designed public places ‑m→ artwork

But the answer choice says: public places artwork ‑m→ well-designed

Hope that helps! please feel free to share any feedback or correct me if I’m off!

.

I got the correct answer, but I used a different approach. I immediately eliminated A, C, and E because the stimulus specifically refers to both 'CFs and Rests,' while those choices mentioned only one or the other. Is this a good approach to use given the time pressure?

This may be a lot of work, but I screenshot the questions on my iPad to annotate and watch from my laptop.

I believe this also adds to the conversation, but there was a lesson that I watched on here that explained negation v. opposition that was helpful to understand negating statements

Negation: Contradiction

Opposition: Opposite

Example:

Negation: Rich - Comfortable, Poor, Middle Class (Anything that contradicts being rich, or like you said, "trying to poke holes in the argument and find a situation")

or you can capture the negation without putting all the examples:

Rich - not rich

Opposition: Hot- Cold (Just the opposite)

For Q4: Do these possibilities also work?

graduate level philosophy course and /undergraduate

or

graduate level philosophy course (some) /undergraduate

interested!

Super helpful, thank you!