How important is the LSAT score in getting a scholarship? I'm an international student and from a poor family. I must get a full scholarship and it's the only way I can afford going to law school. I took the LSAT once and got 175. Is it enough? Should I take it again and try to get a better score or should I work on application essays and other things? Which schools give out more full scholarships to international students? Thank you for your advice!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Congrats! Wow i didn't know that schools could still have spots on waitlists opening up late august. Must always be hopeful!
I understand why A is correct. But I still have problems with it. "Feeding on the grass is the only means by which to make the moth unpalatable" is not the same as "Feeding on the grass is the only protection for the moth." -- We need to make another assumption here, namely, being unpalatable is the only means of protection. B is tempting because B provides an alternative means of protection.
Could you please host another Admission Webinar and Edit Giveaway? I missed the past ones... Thank you!!!
Is it always a reason for caution when the answer choice (A) changes a causal relationship (in the stimulus) into a conditional one?
#help Why is D irrelevant? D eliminates the possibility that people still engage with artworks just in a different way, i.e., looking at snapshots rather than pausing in front of an artwork in the museum for a long time. I think D and E are both necessary assumptions.
#help if we change (C) to "all participants in the first group were already highly motivated...", it would be a perfect answer, right?
i have a question about the statement and E. Is E wrong because the statement is not in the conditional form ("because" instead of "if")? If the statement is in the conditional form: i --> r, r --> d. (i for isolated, r for reducing the chance, d for discouraged). then E seems to have the form of its contrapositive: not d --> not i. correct?
I'm still a little bit confused about D. I understood it this way: if minivans/large sedans, then likely low risks (so minivans is the sufficient condition, while low risks the necessary). Driver says, if i want low risks, then minivans. so that kind of sounds like a confusion of the necessary for the sufficient. what's wrong with that?
#19 I have issues with with JY's explanation of why (B) is incorrect . I think there is nothing wrong with "condition upon" for the author did say "People don't have access to the inside information can't make similarly informed investment decisions."
@ said:
omg girl how? how did you do it (175) as an international student? could you please share your methods or experiences of preparing LSAT...? im in awe btw you are amazing!
lol watch JY's videos and talk to the very nice people here if you're confused ;) do 10 to 15 practice tests and once you understand the logic of the test writer, you can do well :smile: