I understood this a little differently but still got it right so I hope this helps! First turned the conclusion into a conditional using “no” as negate necessary indicator: RED (reader enjoyment depends) -> /ambiguous. From there it was intuitive to me that C says the same thing as “if a Reader’s enjoyment depends on something, it is not going be ambiguous language, hence, that reader isn’t going to be getting enjoyment from poets (writers whose sometimes use words ambiguously).

haha thanks so much! i looked up some videos on it & found there were a few different methods. it seems like the one you mention is most recommended. i appreciate you:-)

Howdy, would someone please explain the best way to blind review questions? I am asked to blind review the q immediately after completing it, and at that point I haven't watched the video explaining the answer. I think I must be misunderstanding, thank you for any help!

Similarly, if anyone is taking August lsat & would like to the same lmk:-))