Hey! Try asking on canlawforum.com too, that's a great resource for Canadian law students.
Big thanks for taking the time out to do this!
Non native speaker, international student. Did all RC and LG questions from PT 1-91 (many multiple times), about 80% of the LR questions too. Took 22 timed tests, put in about 500 hours while working full time at a stressful job in a law firm
Thank you 7sage, you’re truly a blessing.
To all those struggling, keep pushing and then push some more, you will get through! You’re stronger than the test.
Took PT 90 on LawHub today, found there was already an experimental LR section in that. For those you have taken PT 91,92 on LawHub, are the experimental sections different in each of them or is it just 2 LR sections in both?
Don't want to know the exact experimental sections in 91 and 92 - please don't comment - like to stimulate real testing conditions, request anyone to commenting to just tell if there are different sections or just 2 LR in both. If its only LR in both, I will take a different (LG/RC) on 7sage to stimulate the random experimental, so asking for that purpose.
@ Eventually, I had to do the same.
Hi anyone else facing problems in scheduling? Every slot is not available
Hi @ - that was incredibly helpful, thank you!
Hi if any one knows this - do any law schools in US/Canada offer full/partial ride to international applicants?
Would love to join, filled it. :)
It is not about the amount of hours, but the quality of hours that you put in. I am also working a full time job that's really stressful and demanding. Like others I just wake up an hour early - put in that hour towards LSAT and be done with it.
1 High Quality Hour a Day - consistently would lead to better results than pushing yourself so much that you get sick of the test. You should be excited and well rested to study whenever you sit to study.
For Q24, the antiquity point (and the patron example) also seems to point what collectors prized. (Did anyone else follow this line of reasoning)?
#help (Added by Admin)
Premise v Many would agree with that Premise
Premise - Anyone who opposes higher taxes will make a better leader than someone who supports them. This would be considered a true statement, since it’s a premise - validity of it can’t be challenged.
Many would agree premise- Many would agree that anyone who opposes higher taxes will make a better leader than someone who supports them. - It is true that many people would agree on ‘X’ but that doesn’t mean that ‘X’ is true.
Many people would believe that (earth is flat). Premise - Many people believe X. But the premise can’t be taken to mean X is true. The belief of many people could be right or wrong - we don’t know.
Why B is wrong - there needs to be an “if” attached to the statement to make it a sufficient and necessary statement.
‘Working hard will get you success’ doesn’t equal to ‘If you work hard, you will get success’. In the latter, there’s a sufficient necessary relationship but not in the former.
A - would destroy the former argument because it would state - working hard is not relevant to success, B - won’t destroy/even affect it because it tries to counter something that was not even stated.
Spent 40 mins to understand this question and why A is wrong.
The whole question could be understood by everyone if we understand that the "quantity of fish found in a particular part of the lake would not always be correlated to the ease of catching it". We have to correlated the two and make that additional assumption. But we don't have to make any additional assumption in E. That is why E's better.
Found JY's explanation to be a bit too complicated for this one.
You need to be comfortable with taking PTs, that will take time. So just postpone, you gotta be patient and enjoy the journey as well.
Is a writing board allowed for the online LSAT (just a wooden/plastic board to place the scratch paper on), most table surfaces aren't conducive to placing the paper directly on them and writing on the same. I have mailed LSAC but just wanted to know if anyone who has taken the online LSAT has used it or has been asked by the Proctor not to use it?
While fool-proofing games from PT1-35, have heard JY often say Misc Games from the earlier tests are very rare now - is that still true? I always tend to trip up on those kinds of games. How much should I worry about these keeping recent tests in mind?
Felt so happy to read your story! Good luck!
I'm a non-native speaker as well! This is damn inspiring, congrats!
Congratulations & good luck for the application cycle.